PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDEI vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDEI vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDEI achieves a 8.69% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.


CDEI

1D
-1.07%
1M
4.21%
YTD
8.69%
6M
8.86%
1Y
26.09%
3Y*
19.04%
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.94%
YTD
32.04%
6M
37.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDEI vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CDEI and AFOS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.76

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDEI vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDEI
CDEI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CDEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDEI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CDEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDEI Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

AFOS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDEI vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDEIAFOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.52

CDEI vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDEIAFOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

4.35

-3.04

Drawdowns

CDEI vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDEI drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDEI and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDEIAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.46%

-11.52%

-7.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-0.29%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-1.37%

-0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

Volatility

CDEI vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDEIAFOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

20.19%

-8.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

20.19%

-5.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

20.19%

-5.17%

CDEI vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDEI has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDEI vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

CDEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
0.22%0.30%0.00%0.00%
CDEI
Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF
0.97%1.05%1.22%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDEI and AFOS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CDEI is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CDEI is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.

CDEI has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: Calvert and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CDEI and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDEI and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer