PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDDYX vs. FBLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDDYX vs. FBLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CDDYX having a 8.15% return and FBLEX slightly higher at 8.36%. Over the past 10 years, CDDYX has outperformed FBLEX with an annualized return of 12.64%, while FBLEX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.89% annualized return.


CDDYX

1D
0.94%
1M
1.47%
YTD
8.15%
6M
8.50%
1Y
20.48%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
12.64%

FBLEX

1D
0.33%
1M
2.07%
YTD
8.36%
6M
9.82%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDDYX vs. FBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
8.15%15.95%15.17%10.65%-4.84%26.43%7.92%28.74%-4.27%20.34%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
8.36%17.06%18.04%15.60%-4.82%26.83%4.34%25.57%-9.04%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CDDYX and FBLEX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2012

0.93

The correlation between CDDYX and FBLEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDDYX vs. FBLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDDYX
CDDYX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CDDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CDDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLEX
FBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDDYX vs. FBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDDYXFBLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.40

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

3.35

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.44

13.56

+0.88

CDDYX vs. FBLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDDYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the FBLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDDYX and FBLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDDYXFBLEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.20

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.78

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.69

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.73

+0.15

Drawdowns

CDDYX vs. FBLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDDYX drawdown since its inception was -32.74%, smaller than the maximum FBLEX drawdown of -39.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDDYX and FBLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDDYXFBLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.74%

-39.73%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.51%

-6.89%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-14.71%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.91%

-19.00%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.74%

-39.73%

+6.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.20%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-3.83%

+1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

1.70%

-0.24%

Volatility

CDDYX vs. FBLEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) is 2.48%, while Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) has a volatility of 2.69%. This indicates that CDDYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDDYXFBLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

2.69%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.87%

7.89%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.07%

10.50%

-1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

14.79%

-1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

17.40%

-1.71%

CDDYX vs. FBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDDYX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLEX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDDYX vs. FBLEX - Dividend Comparison

CDDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, less than FBLEX's 10.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
4.97%5.33%5.99%4.96%3.90%2.93%1.85%3.28%7.65%4.03%3.84%8.35%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.25%9.95%12.63%5.05%12.66%14.51%3.85%5.65%10.97%7.09%2.47%13.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, CDDYX and FBLEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FBLEX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to CDDYX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDDYX dropped -32.74% vs FBLEX's -39.73%.

CDDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDDYX and FBLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer