CDC vs. VTV
CDC (VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - CDC tracks the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index while VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CDC returned 10.81%/yr vs 13.32%/yr for VTV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CDC charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
CDC vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDC achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 16.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CDC has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 10.81%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.32% annualized return.
CDC
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 14.02%
- 1Y
- 22.77%
- 3Y*
- 13.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
VTV
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 16.08%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 28.72%
- 3Y*
- 19.06%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- 13.32%
CDC vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 14.81% | 8.96% | 14.48% | -4.99% | -7.86% | 33.05% | 12.88% | 19.64% | -5.97% | 15.77% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 16.08% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDC and VTV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2014 | 0.88 |
The correlation between CDC and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CDC vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CDC
VTV
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
CDC
VTV
Utilities
CDC
VTV
Consumer Defensive
CDC
VTV
Energy
CDC
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
CDC
VTV
Healthcare
CDC
VTV
Technology
CDC
VTV
Industrials
CDC
VTV
Communication Services
CDC
VTV
Basic Materials
CDC
VTV
Real Estate
CDC
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDC vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
CDC
VTV
CDC vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDC | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.50 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | 4.54 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.20 | 17.12 | -2.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDC vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDC drawdown since its inception was -21.37%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDC and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDC | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.37% | -59.27% | +37.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -6.35% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.70% | -14.52% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.37% | -17.04% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.37% | -36.78% | +15.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -7.85% | +2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 1.68% | -0.07% |
Volatility
CDC vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) is 3.32%, while Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that CDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDC | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 3.51% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 7.91% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.99% | 10.43% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.52% | 13.88% | -1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 16.64% | -3.44% |
CDC vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDC has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDC vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than VTV's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.12% | 3.36% | 3.32% | 4.24% | 3.48% | 2.65% | 2.48% | 3.04% | 3.37% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 3.17% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.80% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDC and VTV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTV has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to CDC (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDC dropped -21.37% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 13.32% vs 10.81% for CDC. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, CDC has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 13.32% return vs 10.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for CDC.
CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 1.80% for VTV.
CDC tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for CDC and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDC and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer