CDC vs. VMAX
CDC (VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF) and VMAX (Hartford US Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. CDC is passively managed, while VMAX is actively managed. Over the past year, CDC returned 22.77% vs 29.83% for VMAX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CDC charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for VMAX.
Performance
CDC vs. VMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDC achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly lower than VMAX's 15.89% return.
CDC
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 14.02%
- 1Y
- 22.77%
- 3Y*
- 13.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
VMAX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 29.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDC vs. VMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 14.81% | 8.96% | 14.48% | 1.28% |
VMAX Hartford US Value ETF | 15.89% | 15.65% | 15.89% | 5.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDC and VMAX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023 | 0.72 |
The correlation between CDC and VMAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CDC vs. VMAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CDC
VMAX
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
CDC
VMAX
Utilities
CDC
VMAX
Consumer Defensive
CDC
VMAX
Energy
CDC
VMAX
Consumer Cyclical
CDC
VMAX
Healthcare
CDC
VMAX
Technology
CDC
VMAX
Industrials
CDC
VMAX
Communication Services
CDC
VMAX
Basic Materials
CDC
VMAX
Real Estate
CDC
VMAX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDC vs. VMAX — Risk / Return Rank
CDC
VMAX
CDC vs. VMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDC | VMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.43 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | 6.08 | -2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.20 | 21.32 | -7.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDC vs. VMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDC drawdown since its inception was -21.37%, which is greater than VMAX's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDC and VMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDC | VMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.37% | -19.05% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -4.93% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -2.52% | -2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 1.40% | +0.21% |
Volatility
CDC vs. VMAX - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDC | VMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 3.22% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 8.83% | -1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.99% | 12.29% | -2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.52% | 15.39% | -2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 15.39% | -2.19% |
CDC vs. VMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDC has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than VMAX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDC vs. VMAX - Dividend Comparison
CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than VMAX's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.12% | 3.36% | 3.32% | 4.24% | 3.48% | 2.65% | 2.48% | 3.04% | 3.37% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 3.17% |
VMAX Hartford US Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.14% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDC and VMAX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDC has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to VMAX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDC dropped -21.37% vs VMAX's -19.05%.
On 1-year performance, VMAX leads with 29.83% vs 22.77% for CDC. On fees, VMAX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, VMAX has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VMAX has performed better with a 29.83% return vs 22.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VMAX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for CDC.
CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 1.86% for VMAX.
They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for CDC and 0.29% for VMAX.
VMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDC and VMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer