PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CD91.DE vs. G2XJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CD91.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist (CD91.DE) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CD91.DE achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly higher than G2XJ.DE's -3.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CD91.DE having a 12.49% annualized return and G2XJ.DE not far ahead at 12.60%.


CD91.DE

1D
0.92%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
2.09%
6M
9.79%
1Y
67.95%
3Y*
40.18%
5Y*
20.17%
10Y*
12.49%

G2XJ.DE

1D
0.42%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
-3.74%
6M
7.48%
1Y
61.87%
3Y*
42.43%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
12.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CD91.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CD91.DE
Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist
2.09%132.40%20.73%2.42%-1.60%-8.06%15.38%49.81%-12.27%-11.24%
G2XJ.DE
VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS
-3.74%149.58%21.45%3.64%-6.09%-15.55%18.76%43.18%-8.98%-10.97%

Correlation

The correlation between CD91.DE and G2XJ.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015

0.93

The correlation between CD91.DE and G2XJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CD91.DE vs. G2XJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CD91.DE
CD91.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CD91.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

G2XJ.DE
G2XJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
G2XJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CD91.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist (CD91.DE) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CD91.DEG2XJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.11

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.17

5.07

+1.10

CD91.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CD91.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the G2XJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CD91.DE and G2XJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CD91.DEG2XJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.33

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.50

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.33

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.39

-0.30

Drawdowns

CD91.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CD91.DE drawdown since its inception was -80.32%, which is greater than G2XJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -49.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CD91.DE and G2XJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CD91.DEG2XJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.32%

-49.96%

-30.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.16%

-29.24%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.16%

-29.24%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.56%

-40.82%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.46%

-49.96%

-5.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.41%

-25.97%

+2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.60%

-25.26%

-21.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.95%

12.16%

-1.21%

Volatility

CD91.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist (CD91.DE) is 13.40%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) has a volatility of 15.07%. This indicates that CD91.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G2XJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CD91.DEG2XJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.40%

15.07%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.89%

38.04%

-4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.29%

46.48%

-4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.31%

36.98%

-2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.40%

37.69%

-3.29%

CD91.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CD91.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than G2XJ.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

CD91.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

CD91.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while G2XJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CD91.DE
Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist
0.13%0.14%0.31%2.37%1.05%0.46%0.14%0.30%0.00%0.57%
G2XJ.DE
VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, CD91.DE and G2XJ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, G2XJ.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

G2XJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CD91.DE.

CD91.DE is categorized as Gold, while G2XJ.DE is Precious Metals. CD91.DE tracks NYSE Arca Gold BUGS, while G2XJ.DE tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CD91.DE and 0.55% for G2XJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CD91.DE and G2XJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer