PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CD vs. QURE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CD vs. QURE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chaince Digital Holdings Inc (CD) and uniQure N.V. (QURE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CD achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than QURE's 12.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CD has underperformed QURE with an annualized return of -25.65%, while QURE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.62% annualized return.


CD

1D
-6.38%
1M
-20.67%
YTD
0.40%
6M
-23.58%
1Y
18.25%
3Y*
23.64%
5Y*
-7.27%
10Y*
-25.65%

QURE

1D
2.08%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
12.83%
6M
24.02%
1Y
56.34%
3Y*
11.25%
5Y*
-5.87%
10Y*
8.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CD vs. QURE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CD
Chaince Digital Holdings Inc
0.40%-27.23%162.69%109.41%-64.75%3.93%85.98%17.14%-93.14%-72.87%
QURE
uniQure N.V.
12.83%35.50%160.86%-70.14%9.31%-42.60%-49.58%148.65%47.12%249.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CD and QURE is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2015

0.09

The correlation between CD and QURE shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

CD:

-$0.23

QURE:

-$3.58

PS Ratio

CD:

189.51

QURE:

87.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

CD:

$1.67M

QURE:

$18.09M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CD:

-$1.10M

QURE:

$13.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

CD:

-$10.65M

QURE:

-$164.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CD vs. QURE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CD
CD Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CD Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

QURE
QURE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
QURE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
QURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QURE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CD vs. QURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chaince Digital Holdings Inc (CD) and uniQure N.V. (QURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDQUREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.43

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

0.65

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.28

1.06

-0.78

CD vs. QURE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CD Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the QURE Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CD and QURE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDQUREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

0.21

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

-0.04

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

0.07

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

0.05

-0.25

Drawdowns

CD vs. QURE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CD drawdown since its inception was -99.79%, roughly equal to the maximum QURE drawdown of -95.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CD and QURE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDQUREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.79%

-95.40%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-89.83%

-87.21%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.83%

-87.21%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.40%

-90.11%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.58%

-95.40%

-4.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.13%

-67.15%

-30.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.97%

-56.58%

-33.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

66.38%

53.50%

+12.88%

Volatility

CD vs. QURE - Volatility Comparison

Chaince Digital Holdings Inc (CD) has a higher volatility of 57.45% compared to uniQure N.V. (QURE) at 28.01%. This indicates that CD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDQUREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

57.45%

28.01%

+29.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

108.02%

92.44%

+15.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

187.50%

273.61%

-86.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

151.90%

154.08%

-2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

146.14%

119.92%

+26.22%

Dividends

CD vs. QURE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CD nor QURE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CD vs. QURE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chaince Digital Holdings Inc and uniQure N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M202120222023202420252026
466.58K
3.56M
(CD) Total Revenue
(QURE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CD and QURE have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CD has higher volatility (57.45%) compared to QURE (28.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CD dropped -99.79% vs QURE's -95.40%.

QURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CD and QURE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer