CCWSX vs. PZRIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Chautauqua International Growth Fund (CCWSX) and PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX).
CCWSX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Apr 14, 2016. PZRIX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 4, 2015.
Performance
CCWSX vs. PZRIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCWSX vs. PZRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCWSX Chautauqua International Growth Fund | -16.07% | 19.17% | 11.30% | 12.16% | -18.05% | 6.62% | 39.37% | 26.43% | -17.36% | 34.60% |
PZRIX PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund | 7.89% | 34.05% | 3.29% | 19.31% | -9.11% | 12.08% | 1.74% | 15.94% | -14.93% | 24.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCWSX achieves a -16.07% return, which is significantly lower than PZRIX's 7.89% return.
CCWSX
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -14.16%
- YTD
- -16.07%
- 6M
- -15.98%
- 1Y
- -4.75%
- 3Y*
- 3.78%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- —
PZRIX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -6.89%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 16.45%
- 1Y
- 34.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.91%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CCWSX vs. PZRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCWSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PZRIX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CCWSX vs. PZRIX — Risk / Return Rank
CCWSX
PZRIX
CCWSX vs. PZRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chautauqua International Growth Fund (CCWSX) and PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCWSX | PZRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | 2.41 | -2.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | 3.09 | -3.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.47 | -0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 2.70 | -3.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 12.87 | -14.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCWSX | PZRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 | 2.41 | -2.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.67 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.58 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between CCWSX and PZRIX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CCWSX vs. PZRIX - Dividend Comparison
CCWSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than PZRIX's 6.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCWSX Chautauqua International Growth Fund | 1.70% | 1.43% | 0.45% | 0.16% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.28% | 1.85% | 2.25% | 3.31% | 0.00% |
PZRIX PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund | 6.08% | 6.56% | 6.70% | 9.19% | 8.80% | 11.99% | 2.04% | 6.32% | 2.80% | 4.13% | 2.58% |
Drawdowns
CCWSX vs. PZRIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCWSX drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum PZRIX drawdown of -43.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCWSX and PZRIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCWSX | PZRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -43.53% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.75% | -10.68% | -9.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | -30.85% | -3.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.75% | -6.96% | -12.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -9.00% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.32% | 2.53% | +2.79% |
Volatility
CCWSX vs. PZRIX - Volatility Comparison
Chautauqua International Growth Fund (CCWSX) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX) at 5.02%. This indicates that CCWSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PZRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCWSX | PZRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 5.02% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.85% | 8.77% | +3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.25% | 14.09% | +4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 15.83% | +2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.41% | 17.01% | +1.40% |