PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCSZX vs. CCRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCSZX vs. CCRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) and Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCSZX achieves a 21.56% return, which is significantly higher than CCRSX's 17.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CCSZX has underperformed CCRSX with an annualized return of 6.77%, while CCRSX has yielded a comparatively higher 25.76% annualized return.


CCSZX

1D
-0.99%
1M
-6.97%
YTD
21.56%
6M
20.34%
1Y
29.38%
3Y*
13.66%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
6.77%

CCRSX

1D
-0.76%
1M
-8.99%
YTD
17.09%
6M
15.64%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
57.50%
10Y*
25.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCSZX vs. CCRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCSZX
Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund
21.56%15.36%7.11%-6.90%15.80%31.34%-1.17%7.45%-14.09%1.71%
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
17.09%15.37%4.86%-8.88%15.71%667.99%-1.49%6.69%-11.63%-7.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CCSZX and CCRSX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2012

0.96

The correlation between CCSZX and CCRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCSZX vs. CCRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCSZX
CCSZX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CCSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CCSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

CCRSX
CCRSX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CCRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CCRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCSZX vs. CCRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) and Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCSZXCCRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.25

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

1.93

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

7.48

+2.38

CCSZX vs. CCRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the CCRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSZX and CCRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCSZX vs. CCRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSZX drawdown since its inception was -61.34%, smaller than the maximum CCRSX drawdown of -78.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSZX and CCRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCSZXCCRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.34%

-78.02%

+16.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-11.76%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.17%

-11.76%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.86%

-25.53%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.16%

-36.73%

+2.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.56%

-11.76%

+2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.26%

-41.24%

+9.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

3.27%

-0.38%

Volatility

CCSZX vs. CCRSX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) and Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) have volatilities of 3.75% and 3.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCSZXCCRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

3.87%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.49%

14.45%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.65%

16.60%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

222.80%

-205.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

157.73%

-142.82%

CCSZX vs. CCRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCSZX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than CCRSX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCSZX vs. CCRSX - Dividend Comparison

CCSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than CCRSX's 11.84% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
11.84%3.98%2.95%26.59%18.97%4.82%5.51%0.86%2.91%0.00%
CCSZX
Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund
2.47%3.00%8.84%4.42%94.73%36.39%0.13%1.09%18.52%0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, CCSZX and CCRSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CCRSX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to CCSZX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCSZX dropped -61.34% vs CCRSX's -78.02%.

CCSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCSZX and CCRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer