PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCRV vs. CIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCRV vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CCRV

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

CIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
5.44%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
8.18%
ALL TIME*
7.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CCRV vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CCRV
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF
0.00%-0.05%5.74%5.47%19.91%33.78%7.16%
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
5.44%32.99%3.76%16.29%-16.00%11.07%10.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CCRV and CIL is -0.19, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020

0.21

The correlation between CCRV and CIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCRV vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CCRV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CIL
CIL Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CCRV vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCRVCILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.39

CCRV vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCRV vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCRVCILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

Volatility

CCRV vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCRVCILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.74%

CCRV vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCRV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCRV vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCRV
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF
0.00%0.00%4.43%7.26%33.27%26.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
1.05%2.70%3.46%2.91%2.41%3.04%1.73%2.69%2.85%2.17%2.34%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCRV and CIL have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CCRV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CCRV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.

CIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for CCRV.

CCRV is categorized as Commodities, while CIL is Foreign Large Cap Equities. CCRV tracks CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CCRV and 0.45% for CIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCRV and CIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer