CCRV vs. BCD
CCRV (iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF) and BCD (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both Commodities funds - CCRV tracks the CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index while BCD tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Total Return. Both are passively managed. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CCRV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for BCD.
Performance
CCRV vs. BCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CCRV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BCD
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- YTD
- 15.92%
- 1Y
- 27.97%
- 3Y*
- 10.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.71M | $1.62M | $2.21M |
CCRV vs. BCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | -0.05% | 5.74% | 5.47% | 19.91% | 33.78% | 7.16% |
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 15.92% | 15.71% | 6.20% | -7.58% | 18.38% | 31.87% | 8.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCRV and BCD is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CCRV and BCD has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCRV vs. BCD — Risk / Return Rank
CCRV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BCD
CCRV vs. BCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCRV | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.21 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.18 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCRV vs. BCD - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCRV | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -29.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -7.22% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -9.82% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.90% | — |
Volatility
CCRV vs. BCD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCRV | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 14.24% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 15.36% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 13.91% | — |
CCRV vs. BCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCRV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BCD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCRV vs. BCD - Dividend Comparison
CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.85% | 17.21% | 3.60% | 4.51% | 5.21% | 8.30% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 0.07% |
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.43% | 7.26% | 33.27% | 26.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCRV and BCD have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CCRV.
BCD has the higher dividend yield at 14.85%, compared with 0.00% for CCRV.
CCRV tracks CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index, while BCD tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CCRV and 0.30% for BCD.
Find the right allocation for CCRV and BCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer