PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCRSX vs. GCCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCRSX vs. GCCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) and Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCRSX achieves a 26.97% return, which is significantly higher than GCCIX's 18.82% return. Over the past 10 years, CCRSX has outperformed GCCIX with an annualized return of 6.01%, while GCCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.07% annualized return.


CCRSX

1D
1.21%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
26.97%
6M
26.90%
1Y
38.98%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
11.37%
10Y*
6.01%

GCCIX

1D
0.82%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
18.82%
6M
19.60%
1Y
29.86%
3Y*
14.47%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*
5.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCRSX vs. GCCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
26.97%15.37%4.86%-8.88%15.71%28.00%-1.49%6.69%-11.63%-7.99%
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
18.82%15.45%5.92%-9.65%15.70%33.42%-23.01%16.75%-14.89%4.31%

Correlation

The correlation between CCRSX and GCCIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2007

0.87

The correlation between CCRSX and GCCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCRSX vs. GCCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCRSX
CCRSX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CCRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CCRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

GCCIX
GCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCRSX vs. GCCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) and Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCRSXGCCIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.56

2.29

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.19

2.91

+0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.41

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.40

4.17

+1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.63

11.31

+3.32

CCRSX vs. GCCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCRSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the GCCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCRSX and GCCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCRSXGCCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.29

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.56

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.25

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

-0.15

+0.15

Drawdowns

CCRSX vs. GCCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCRSX drawdown since its inception was -93.56%, roughly equal to the maximum GCCIX drawdown of -90.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCRSX and GCCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCRSXGCCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.56%

-90.80%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-7.48%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.56%

-11.89%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.30%

-28.78%

-54.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.30%

-57.76%

-25.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.09%

-70.56%

+30.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.08%

-69.43%

+18.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.76%

+0.02%

Volatility

CCRSX vs. GCCIX - Volatility Comparison

Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) at 4.95%. This indicates that CCRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCRSXGCCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

4.95%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.33%

12.20%

+2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.48%

14.40%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

225.85%

18.48%

+207.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

159.90%

20.02%

+139.88%

CCRSX vs. GCCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCRSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than GCCIX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCRSX vs. GCCIX - Dividend Comparison

CCRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.92%, less than GCCIX's 13.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
10.92%3.98%2.95%26.59%18.97%4.82%5.51%0.86%2.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
13.54%16.09%4.08%4.20%10.41%16.46%0.36%10.81%1.47%5.88%0.84%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, CCRSX and GCCIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CCRSX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to GCCIX (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCRSX dropped -93.56% vs GCCIX's -90.80%.

CCRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCRSX and GCCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer