PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCOR vs. ALTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CCOR vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CCOR vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
-0.43%3.52%-5.70%-11.92%2.51%9.90%3.91%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
2.74%16.61%12.30%-15.85%-10.67%45.30%33.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCOR achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than ALTL's 2.74% return.


CCOR

1D
-0.09%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
0.52%
1Y
-1.24%
3Y*
-3.35%
5Y*
-0.95%
10Y*

ALTL

1D
0.34%
1M
-5.11%
YTD
2.74%
6M
3.20%
1Y
27.97%
3Y*
6.37%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CCOR vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCOR has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than ALTL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CCOR vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCOR
CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

ALTL
ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCOR vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCORALTLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.12

1.51

-1.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.10

2.06

-2.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.28

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

2.85

-3.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.32

9.84

-10.16

CCOR vs. ALTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the ALTL Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCOR and ALTL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCORALTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

1.51

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.18

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.62

-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between CCOR and ALTL is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CCOR vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison

CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, which matches ALTL's 1.07% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
1.07%1.07%1.18%1.21%1.11%1.02%1.50%0.73%1.53%0.89%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
1.07%0.95%1.56%1.28%1.23%1.06%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CCOR vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, smaller than the maximum ALTL drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOR and ALTL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CCORALTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.99%

-31.91%

+8.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.17%

-9.79%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.99%

-31.91%

+8.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.30%

-5.11%

-12.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-11.84%

+4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

2.83%

+2.14%

Volatility

CCOR vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is 2.13%, while Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that CCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CCORALTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.13%

3.01%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.44%

13.21%

-7.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.73%

18.57%

-7.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.13%

18.21%

-7.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.81%

20.10%

-9.29%