CCOM vs. COMT
CCOM (Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both Commodities funds. CCOM is actively managed, while COMT is passively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCOM charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
CCOM vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CCOM
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -11.91%
- YTD
- 23.88%
- 6M
- 22.75%
- 1Y
- 25.27%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
CCOM vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF | -2.80% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 15.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCOM and COMT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCOM vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
CCOM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COMT
CCOM vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCOM | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.99 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCOM vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCOM drawdown since its inception was -6.38%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOM and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCOM | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.38% | -51.89% | +45.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.78% | -15.58% | +10.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.62% | -24.00% | +21.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.65% | — |
Volatility
CCOM vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCOM | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.37% | 21.45% | -8.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.37% | 21.13% | -7.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.37% | 18.86% | -5.49% |
CCOM vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCOM has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCOM vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
CCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than COMT's 6.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 6.25% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCOM and COMT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CCOM.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 6.25%, compared with 0.83% for CCOM.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CCOM and 0.48% for COMT.
Find the right allocation for CCOM and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer