CCNR vs. RISR
CCNR (ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF) and RISR (FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCNR is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by ALPS, while RISR is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by FolioBeyond. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CCNR returned 50.28% vs 6.29% for RISR. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CCNR charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for RISR.
Performance
CCNR vs. RISR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCNR achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly higher than RISR's 4.75% return.
CCNR
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 50.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.52%
RISR
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 1Y
- 6.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $256.37K | $2.34M | $1.27M | |
| $3.20M | $3.07M | $3.51M |
CCNR vs. RISR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 16.37% | 46.48% | -7.79% |
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 4.75% | 4.63% | 8.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCNR and RISR is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024 | -0.06 |
The correlation between CCNR and RISR shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCNR vs. RISR — Risk / Return Rank
CCNR
RISR
CCNR vs. RISR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCNR | RISR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.22 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 2.42 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.72 | 5.79 | +5.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCNR vs. RISR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCNR drawdown since its inception was -20.06%, which is greater than RISR's maximum drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCNR and RISR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCNR | RISR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.06% | -14.31% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.88% | -2.61% | -10.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.53% | -0.15% | -9.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.02% | -2.12% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | 1.09% | +3.21% |
Volatility
CCNR vs. RISR - Volatility Comparison
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) at 1.13%. This indicates that CCNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RISR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCNR | RISR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 1.13% | +3.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.49% | 3.57% | +9.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.61% | 5.25% | +13.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 11.67% | +8.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 11.67% | +8.29% |
CCNR vs. RISR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCNR has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than RISR's 1.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCNR vs. RISR - Dividend Comparison
CCNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than RISR's 5.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 2.99% | 3.48% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 5.88% | 5.95% | 5.67% | 7.96% | 4.26% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCNR and RISR have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCNR has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to RISR (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCNR dropped -20.06% vs RISR's -14.31%.
On 1-year performance, CCNR leads with 50.28% vs 6.29% for RISR. On fees, CCNR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RISR has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CCNR has performed better with a 50.28% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CCNR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for RISR.
RISR has the higher dividend yield at 5.88%, compared with 2.99% for CCNR.
CCNR is categorized as Natural Resources, while RISR is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ALPS and FolioBeyond. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CCNR and 1.13% for RISR.
CCNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCNR and RISR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer