CCNR vs. LRCU

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

CCNR (ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCNR is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by ALPS, while LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCNR charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for LRCU.

Performance

CCNR vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCNR achieves a 21.92% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 268.21% return.

CCNR

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -3.42%
• YTD: 21.92%
• 6M: 23.45%
• 1Y: 55.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRCU

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: 57.23%
• YTD: 268.21%
• 6M: 315.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCNR vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	21.92%	22.57%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	268.21%	172.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CCNR and LRCU is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

CCNR vs. LRCU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCNR

CCNR Risk / Return Rank: 93
CCNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CCNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CCNR Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CCNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CCNR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

LRCU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCNR vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCNR	LRCU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.05	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.25	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.70	—	—

Drawdowns

CCNR vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCNR drawdown since its inception was -20.06%, smaller than the maximum LRCU drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCNR and LRCU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCNR	LRCU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.06%	-40.09%	+20.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.21%	0.00%	-5.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.58%	-9.34%	+5.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCNR	LRCU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.78%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.66%	113.97%	-95.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.14%	113.97%	-93.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.14%	113.97%	-93.83%

CCNR vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCNR has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCNR vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison

CCNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, while LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	2.86%	3.48%	1.27%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCNR and LRCU in my portfolio?

CCNR and LRCU have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CCNR or LRCU?

On fees, CCNR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCNR or LRCU?

CCNR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCNR or LRCU?

CCNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.

What is the main difference between CCNR and LRCU?

CCNR is categorized as Natural Resources, while LRCU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: ALPS and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CCNR and 1.30% for LRCU.