CCJ vs. AIQ

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

CCJ (Cameco Corporation) is a stock, while AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Over the past 5 years, CCJ returned 39.81%/yr vs 18.01%/yr for AIQ. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CCJ vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a 16.97% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 30.85% return.

CCJ

• 1D: 6.00%
• 1M: -0.46%
• YTD: 16.97%
• 6M: 19.20%
• 1Y: 60.86%
• 3Y*: 50.21%
• 5Y*: 39.81%
• 10Y*: 26.60%

AIQ

• 1D: 3.98%
• 1M: 9.03%
• YTD: 30.85%
• 6M: 33.54%
• 1Y: 60.30%
• 3Y*: 33.19%
• 5Y*: 18.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCJ vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CCJ Cameco Corporation	16.97%	78.38%	19.47%	90.49%	4.35%	63.19%	51.47%	-21.08%	-0.47%
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	30.85%	31.89%	24.11%	55.39%	-36.44%	17.09%	52.88%	39.94%	-14.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CCJ and AIQ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018	0.43

The correlation between CCJ and AIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CCJ vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCJ

CCJ Risk / Return Rank: 75
CCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
CCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
CCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 71
CCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
CCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 77

AIQ

AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 76
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 76
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCJ vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCJ	AIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	2.37	-1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	2.91	-1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.40	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	3.68	-1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.06	12.07	-7.01

CCJ vs. AIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the AIQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCJ and AIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCJ vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.53%, which is greater than AIQ's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and AIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCJ	AIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.53%	-44.66%	-42.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.13%	-16.47%	-12.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.01%	-26.35%	-13.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.01%	-44.66%	+4.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.19%	-5.12%	-15.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.07%	-9.79%	-36.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.06%	5.01%	+7.05%

Volatility

CCJ vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison

Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a higher volatility of 18.89% compared to Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) at 13.44%. This indicates that CCJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCJ	AIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.89%	13.44%	+5.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.27%	21.69%	+18.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.58%	25.60%	+29.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.84%	25.80%	+24.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.80%	25.74%	+21.06%

Dividends

CCJ vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison

CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	0.14%	0.18%	0.14%	0.16%	0.56%	0.15%	0.50%	0.51%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CCJ Cameco Corporation	0.16%	0.19%	0.22%	0.20%	0.39%	0.29%	0.46%	0.67%	0.53%	4.33%	3.82%	3.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCJ and AIQ in my portfolio?

CCJ and AIQ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCJ or AIQ?

CCJ has higher volatility (18.89%) compared to AIQ (13.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCJ dropped -87.53% vs AIQ's -44.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.