CCIF vs. OXLC
CCIF (Carlyle Credit Income Fund) is Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Carlyle, while OXLC (Oxford Lane Capital Corp.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, CCIF returned -7.78%/yr vs -7.26%/yr for OXLC. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCIF vs. OXLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCIF achieves a -27.46% return, which is significantly lower than OXLC's -21.55% return.
CCIF
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -6.48%
- YTD
- -27.46%
- 6M
- -33.52%
- 1Y
- -40.60%
- 3Y*
- -16.26%
- 5Y*
- -7.78%
- 10Y*
- —
OXLC
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- -21.55%
- 6M
- -22.31%
- 1Y
- -38.24%
- 3Y*
- -7.39%
- 5Y*
- -7.26%
- 10Y*
- 4.51%
CCIF vs. OXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCIF Carlyle Credit Income Fund | -27.46% | -27.64% | 16.37% | 14.50% | -6.37% | 12.67% | 0.51% | -12.85% |
OXLC Oxford Lane Capital Corp. | -21.55% | -24.38% | 24.58% | 16.52% | -24.15% | 59.91% | -15.79% | -11.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCIF and OXLC is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2019 | 0.17 |
Over the past year, CCIF and OXLC have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCIF vs. OXLC — Risk / Return Rank
CCIF
OXLC
CCIF vs. OXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) and Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCIF | OXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 0.79 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | -0.72 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.67 | -1.29 | -0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCIF | OXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.36 | -1.12 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | -0.28 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | 0.08 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
CCIF vs. OXLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCIF drawdown since its inception was -51.70%, smaller than the maximum OXLC drawdown of -74.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCIF and OXLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCIF | OXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.70% | -74.58% | +22.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.40% | -53.56% | +10.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.70% | -57.17% | +5.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.70% | -57.17% | +5.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.90% | -43.81% | -6.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.73% | -13.96% | +2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.29% | 29.75% | -5.46% |
Volatility
CCIF vs. OXLC - Volatility Comparison
Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC) at 5.37%. This indicates that CCIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OXLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCIF | OXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 5.37% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.94% | 27.87% | -1.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.91% | 34.31% | -4.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 25.91% | -5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.45% | 42.48% | -17.03% |
Dividends
CCIF vs. OXLC - Dividend Comparison
CCIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.64%, less than OXLC's 46.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCIF Carlyle Credit Income Fund | 36.64% | 26.87% | 15.73% | 23.58% | 9.96% | 8.55% | 6.09% | 3.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OXLC Oxford Lane Capital Corp. | 46.65% | 35.86% | 20.12% | 18.83% | 17.75% | 10.51% | 22.46% | 19.85% | 16.70% | 17.91% | 22.84% | 24.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCIF and OXLC have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCIF has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to OXLC (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCIF dropped -51.70% vs OXLC's -74.58%.
OXLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.12 vs -1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCIF and OXLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer