PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCIF vs. OXLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCIF vs. OXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) and Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCIF achieves a -27.46% return, which is significantly lower than OXLC's -21.55% return.


CCIF

1D
-0.65%
1M
-6.48%
YTD
-27.46%
6M
-33.52%
1Y
-40.60%
3Y*
-16.26%
5Y*
-7.78%
10Y*

OXLC

1D
-0.50%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
-21.55%
6M
-22.31%
1Y
-38.24%
3Y*
-7.39%
5Y*
-7.26%
10Y*
4.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCIF vs. OXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CCIF
Carlyle Credit Income Fund
-27.46%-27.64%16.37%14.50%-6.37%12.67%0.51%-12.85%
OXLC
Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
-21.55%-24.38%24.58%16.52%-24.15%59.91%-15.79%-11.54%

Correlation

The correlation between CCIF and OXLC is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2019

0.17

Over the past year, CCIF and OXLC have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCIF vs. OXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCIF
CCIF Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
CCIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCIF Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
CCIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCIF Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

OXLC
OXLC Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
OXLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OXLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
OXLC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
OXLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
OXLC Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCIF vs. OXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) and Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCIFOXLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

0.79

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

-0.72

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.67

-1.29

-0.39

CCIF vs. OXLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCIF Sharpe Ratio is -1.36, which is comparable to the OXLC Sharpe Ratio of -1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCIF and OXLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCIFOXLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.36

-1.12

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

-0.28

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.08

-0.31

Drawdowns

CCIF vs. OXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCIF drawdown since its inception was -51.70%, smaller than the maximum OXLC drawdown of -74.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCIF and OXLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCIFOXLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.70%

-74.58%

+22.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.40%

-53.56%

+10.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.70%

-57.17%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.70%

-57.17%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.90%

-43.81%

-6.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.73%

-13.96%

+2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.29%

29.75%

-5.46%

Volatility

CCIF vs. OXLC - Volatility Comparison

Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC) at 5.37%. This indicates that CCIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OXLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCIFOXLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.26%

5.37%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.94%

27.87%

-1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.91%

34.31%

-4.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.20%

25.91%

-5.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.45%

42.48%

-17.03%

Dividends

CCIF vs. OXLC - Dividend Comparison

CCIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.64%, less than OXLC's 46.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCIF
Carlyle Credit Income Fund
36.64%26.87%15.73%23.58%9.96%8.55%6.09%3.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OXLC
Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
46.65%35.86%20.12%18.83%17.75%10.51%22.46%19.85%16.70%17.91%22.84%24.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCIF and OXLC have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCIF has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to OXLC (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCIF dropped -51.70% vs OXLC's -74.58%.

OXLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.12 vs -1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCIF and OXLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer