PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCIF vs. MSTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCIF vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCIF achieves a -30.52% return, which is significantly lower than MSTY's -27.80% return.


CCIF

1D
2.62%
1M
-7.96%
YTD
-30.52%
6M
-29.77%
1Y
-39.08%
3Y*
-17.12%
5Y*
-9.18%
10Y*

MSTY

1D
-4.55%
1M
-31.74%
YTD
-27.80%
6M
-29.80%
1Y
-66.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCIF vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CCIF
Carlyle Credit Income Fund
-30.52%-27.64%11.94%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
-27.80%-42.71%212.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CCIF and MSTY is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2024

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCIF vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCIF
CCIF Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
CCIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCIF Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
CCIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCIF Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTY
MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCIF vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCIFMSTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

0.79

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

-0.93

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.50

-1.35

-0.15

CCIF vs. MSTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCIF Sharpe Ratio is -1.29, which is comparable to the MSTY Sharpe Ratio of -1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCIF and MSTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCIF vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCIF drawdown since its inception was -53.23%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCIF and MSTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCIFMSTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.23%

-71.79%

+18.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.20%

-71.79%

+26.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.01%

-71.62%

+19.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.00%

-26.97%

+14.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.05%

49.36%

-23.31%

Volatility

CCIF vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) is 7.44%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 19.32%. This indicates that CCIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCIFMSTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

19.32%

-11.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.21%

49.66%

-23.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.52%

62.02%

-31.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.35%

71.82%

-51.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.48%

71.82%

-46.34%

Dividends

CCIF vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison

CCIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.02%, less than MSTY's 286.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CCIF
Carlyle Credit Income Fund
45.02%26.87%15.73%23.58%9.96%8.55%6.09%3.77%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
286.06%294.61%104.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCIF and MSTY have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTY has higher volatility (19.32%) compared to CCIF (7.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCIF dropped -53.23% vs MSTY's -71.79%.

MSTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.08 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCIF and MSTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer