ECC vs. CRF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Eagle Point Credit Company Inc (ECC) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF).

CRF is managed by Cornerstone. It was launched on Jan 2, 1990.

Performance

ECC vs. CRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eagle Point Credit Company Inc (ECC) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ECC vs. CRF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ECC Eagle Point Credit Company Inc	-28.89%	-18.45%	11.77%	12.11%	-11.71%	56.78%	-21.00%	18.80%	-13.72%	27.02%
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	-9.10%	12.46%	44.39%	19.49%	-36.70%	39.73%	28.13%	21.74%	-11.74%	21.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECC achieves a -28.89% return, which is significantly lower than CRF's -9.10% return. Over the past 10 years, ECC has underperformed CRF with an annualized return of 1.60%, while CRF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.28% annualized return.

ECC

• 1D: 4.16%
• 1M: -3.47%
• YTD: -28.89%
• 6M: -33.68%
• 1Y: -39.36%
• 3Y*: -14.11%
• 5Y*: -4.07%
• 10Y*: 1.60%

CRF

• 1D: 4.83%
• 1M: -5.17%
• YTD: -9.10%
• 6M: -5.37%
• 1Y: 18.64%
• 3Y*: 17.40%
• 5Y*: 5.68%
• 10Y*: 11.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ECC vs. CRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECC

ECC Risk / Return Rank: 6
ECC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ECC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
ECC Omega Ratio Rank: 7
ECC Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
ECC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CRF

CRF Risk / Return Rank: 51
CRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
CRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
CRF Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
CRF Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECC vs. CRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eagle Point Credit Company Inc (ECC) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ECC	CRF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.04	0.93	-1.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.50	1.43	-2.93
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.21	-0.39
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.85	1.26	-2.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-2.03	4.66	-6.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ECC vs. CRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECC Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the CRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECC and CRF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ECC	CRF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.04	0.93	-1.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.17	0.22	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04	0.44	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.05	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between ECC and CRF is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ECC vs. CRF - Dividend Comparison

ECC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.68%, more than CRF's 20.17% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECC Eagle Point Credit Company Inc	44.68%	29.17%	20.05%	19.58%	23.42%	11.71%	13.08%	16.43%	16.89%	13.02%	14.36%	14.61%
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	20.17%	17.38%	14.32%	19.94%	29.31%	13.41%	18.91%	21.67%	24.85%	17.96%	24.08%	23.58%

Drawdowns

ECC vs. CRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECC drawdown since its inception was -70.79%, smaller than the maximum CRF drawdown of -80.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECC and CRF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECC	CRF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.79%	-80.70%	+9.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.79%	-14.88%	-30.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.65%	-43.12%	-6.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.79%	-45.90%	-24.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.07%	-10.77%	-35.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.48%	-22.40%	+9.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.21%	4.03%	+15.18%

Volatility

ECC vs. CRF - Volatility Comparison

Eagle Point Credit Company Inc (ECC) has a higher volatility of 12.62% compared to Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) at 8.13%. This indicates that ECC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECC	CRF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.62%	8.13%	+4.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.26%	12.68%	+13.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.98%	20.12%	+17.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.01%	25.83%	-1.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.54%	25.86%	+10.68%