ECC vs. CRF
ECC (Eagle Point Credit Company Inc) is a stock, while CRF (Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Cornerstone. Over the past 10 years, ECC returned 1.85%/yr vs 10.88%/yr for CRF. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ECC vs. CRF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECC achieves a -22.30% return, which is significantly lower than CRF's -0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ECC has underperformed CRF with an annualized return of 1.85%, while CRF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.88% annualized return.
ECC
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- 6M
- -19.38%
- YTD
- -22.30%
- 1Y
- -26.50%
- 3Y*
- -11.05%
- 5Y*
- -4.47%
- 10Y*
- 1.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.39%
CRF
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- 6M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 1Y
- 11.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.46M | $7.87M | $8.14M | |
| $3.03M | $3.29M | $3.85M |
ECC vs. CRF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECC Eagle Point Credit Company Inc | -22.30% | -18.45% | 11.77% | 12.11% | -11.71% | 56.78% | -21.00% | 18.80% | -13.72% | 27.02% |
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. | -0.35% | 12.46% | 44.39% | 19.49% | -36.70% | 39.73% | 28.13% | 21.74% | -11.74% | 21.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECC and CRF is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2014 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECC vs. CRF — Risk / Return Rank
ECC
CRF
ECC vs. CRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eagle Point Credit Company Inc (ECC) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECC | CRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.14 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 0.69 | -1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 2.21 | -3.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECC vs. CRF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECC drawdown since its inception was -70.79%, smaller than the maximum CRF drawdown of -80.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECC and CRF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECC | CRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.79% | -80.70% | +9.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.79% | -14.88% | -30.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.65% | -29.66% | -19.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.65% | -43.12% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.79% | -45.90% | -24.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.07% | -2.18% | -38.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -22.24% | +8.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.53% | 4.66% | +23.87% |
Volatility
ECC vs. CRF - Volatility Comparison
Eagle Point Credit Company Inc (ECC) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) at 3.38%. This indicates that ECC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECC | CRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 3.38% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.12% | 13.90% | +12.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.28% | 15.34% | +18.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.38% | 25.08% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.42% | 25.87% | +10.55% |
Dividends
ECC vs. CRF - Dividend Comparison
ECC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.14%, more than CRF's 19.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. | 19.71% | 17.38% | 14.32% | 19.94% | 29.31% | 13.41% | 18.91% | 21.67% | 24.85% | 17.96% | 24.08% | 23.58% |
ECC Eagle Point Credit Company Inc | 35.14% | 29.17% | 20.05% | 19.58% | 23.42% | 11.71% | 13.08% | 16.43% | 16.89% | 13.02% | 14.36% | 14.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECC and CRF have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECC has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to CRF (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECC dropped -70.79% vs CRF's -80.70%.
CRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECC and CRF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer