CCI vs. QQQI
CCI (Crown Castle Inc.) is a stock, while QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, CCI returned -16.57% vs 23.23% for QQQI. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CCI vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCI achieves a -5.33% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 9.46% return.
CCI
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- -9.14%
- YTD
- -5.33%
- 6M
- -4.23%
- 1Y
- -16.57%
- 3Y*
- -4.04%
- 5Y*
- -11.87%
- 10Y*
- 2.62%
QQQI
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 9.46%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- 1Y
- 23.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCI vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CCI Crown Castle Inc. | -5.33% | 2.96% | -11.60% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 9.46% | 18.62% | 19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCI and QQQI is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCI vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
CCI
QQQI
CCI vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCI | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.30 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 2.43 | -2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | 10.31 | -11.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCI vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCI drawdown since its inception was -97.52%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCI and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCI | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.52% | -20.00% | -77.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.01% | -9.61% | -20.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.68% | -3.67% | -47.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.94% | -2.21% | -23.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.18% | 2.26% | +15.92% |
Volatility
CCI vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) has a higher volatility of 9.74% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 7.62%. This indicates that CCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCI | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.74% | 7.62% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.39% | 11.94% | +11.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.62% | 14.78% | +12.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.77% | 17.51% | +9.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.08% | 17.51% | +8.57% |
Dividends
CCI vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
CCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, less than QQQI's 15.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCI Crown Castle Inc. | 5.17% | 5.35% | 6.90% | 5.43% | 4.41% | 2.62% | 3.10% | 3.22% | 3.94% | 3.51% | 4.15% | 3.87% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 15.03% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCI and QQQI have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCI has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to QQQI (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCI dropped -97.52% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCI and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer