CCH.L vs. GFI
CCH.L (Coca Cola HBC AG) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. CCH.L operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, CCH.L returned 16.35%/yr vs 28.11%/yr for GFI. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCH.L vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CCH.L is traded in GBp, while GFI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GFI values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCH.L achieves a 22.34% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -13.53% return. Over the past 10 years, CCH.L has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 16.35%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 28.11% annualized return.
CCH.L
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 22.34%
- 6M
- 27.17%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 15.57%
- 10Y*
- 16.35%
GFI
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- -17.27%
- YTD
- -13.53%
- 6M
- -13.84%
- 1Y
- 49.49%
- 3Y*
- 36.38%
- 5Y*
- 33.40%
- 10Y*
- 28.11%
CCH.L vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCH.L Coca Cola HBC AG | 22.34% | 43.91% | 22.14% | 20.08% | -19.68% | 10.15% | -4.69% | 11.09% | 3.27% | 39.03% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -13.53% | 216.17% | -4.63% | 37.66% | 8.97% | 24.50% | 38.82% | 82.26% | -11.81% | 32.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCH.L and GFI is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2013 | 0.00 |
The correlation between CCH.L and GFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CCH.L:
£16.70B
GFI:
$32.65B
CCH.L:
€4.84
GFI:
$5.39
CCH.L:
10.98
GFI:
6.78
CCH.L:
0.61
GFI:
0.11
CCH.L:
0.86
GFI:
2.34
CCH.L:
5.03
GFI:
3.87
CCH.L:
€22.35B
GFI:
$13.98B
CCH.L:
€8.14B
GFI:
$7.34B
CCH.L:
€3.00B
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCH.L vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
CCH.L
GFI
CCH.L vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCH.L | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 1.26 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | 3.46 | -1.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCH.L vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCH.L drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, smaller than the maximum GFI drawdown of -87.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCH.L and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCH.L | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.45% | -87.49% | +39.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.05% | -42.09% | +24.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.05% | -42.09% | +24.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.54% | -47.77% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.45% | -63.13% | +14.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | -37.10% | +34.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.55% | -39.90% | +25.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.69% | 15.30% | -6.61% |
Volatility
CCH.L vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) is 5.17%, while Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a volatility of 16.81%. This indicates that CCH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCH.L | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 16.81% | -11.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.79% | 44.31% | -27.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.83% | 58.03% | -35.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 50.17% | -26.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.20% | 53.58% | -27.38% |
Dividends
CCH.L vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
CCH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than GFI's 5.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCH.L Coca Cola HBC AG | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.96% | 2.94% | 3.60% | 2.50% | 2.35% | 6.99% | 1.95% | 1.60% | 1.88% | 1.76% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.04% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
Financials
CCH.L vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coca Cola HBC AG and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CCH.L vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
CCH.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a gross profit of 2.20B and revenue of 5.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
CCH.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported an operating income of 654.01M and revenue of 5.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
CCH.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a net income of 469.16M and revenue of 5.98B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CCH.L and GFI have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CCH.L and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer