PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCFE vs. AVMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCFE vs. AVMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) and Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCFE achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than AVMU's 1.62% return.


CCFE

1D
-1.09%
1M
-5.78%
6M
-5.32%
YTD
0.63%
1Y
2.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVMU

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.07%
6M
1.05%
YTD
1.62%
1Y
7.89%
3Y*
3.40%
5Y*
0.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCFE vs. AVMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CCFE and AVMU is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCFE vs. AVMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCFE
CCFE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CCFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCFE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
CCFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCFE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

AVMU
AVMU Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AVMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVMU Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AVMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVMU Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCFE vs. AVMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) and Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCFEAVMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.53

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

2.38

-2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.29

9.45

-9.16

CCFE vs. AVMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCFE Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the AVMU Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCFE and AVMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCFE vs. AVMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCFE drawdown since its inception was -21.15%, which is greater than AVMU's maximum drawdown of -12.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCFE and AVMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCFEAVMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.15%

-12.41%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.15%

-3.32%

-17.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.91%

-0.68%

-15.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.16%

-3.71%

-3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.51%

0.84%

+8.67%

Volatility

CCFE vs. AVMU - Volatility Comparison

Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) at 0.57%. This indicates that CCFE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCFEAVMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

0.57%

+5.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.72%

2.30%

+16.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.53%

3.17%

+21.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.23%

4.13%

+20.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.23%

3.96%

+20.27%

CCFE vs. AVMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCFE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AVMU's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCFE vs. AVMU - Dividend Comparison

CCFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than AVMU's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AVMU
Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF
3.50%3.50%3.32%2.50%1.29%0.77%
CCFE
Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF
0.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCFE and AVMU have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCFE has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to AVMU (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCFE dropped -21.15% vs AVMU's -12.41%.

On 1-year performance, AVMU leads with 7.89% vs 2.73% for CCFE. On fees, AVMU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVMU has performed better with a 7.89% return vs 2.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVMU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CCFE.

AVMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 0.02% for CCFE.

CCFE is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while AVMU is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Concourse Capital and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CCFE and 0.15% for AVMU.

AVMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCFE and AVMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer