AVMU vs. AMUN
AVMU (Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF) and AMUN (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVMU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMUN.
Performance
AVMU vs. AMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVMU achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly higher than AMUN's 1.13% return.
AVMU
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- 8.38%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- —
AMUN
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVMU vs. AMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVMU Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF | 1.64% | 1.18% |
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 1.13% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVMU and AMUN is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVMU vs. AMUN — Risk / Return Rank
AVMU
AMUN
AVMU vs. AMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVMU | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.58 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.91 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.05 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVMU | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 2.09 | -1.86 |
Drawdowns
AVMU vs. AMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVMU drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, which is greater than AMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVMU and AMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVMU | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.41% | -0.61% | -11.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | 0.00% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -0.09% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | — | — |
Volatility
AVMU vs. AMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVMU | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29% | 1.01% | +2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.13% | 1.01% | +3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 1.01% | +2.98% |
AVMU vs. AMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVMU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AMUN's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVMU vs. AMUN - Dividend Comparison
AVMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than AMUN's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 1.89% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AVMU Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF | 3.22% | 3.50% | 3.32% | 2.50% | 1.29% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVMU and AMUN have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVMU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVMU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMUN.
AVMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.89% for AMUN.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVMU and 0.25% for AMUN.
Find the right allocation for AVMU and AMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer