AVMU vs. AMUN
AVMU (Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF) and AMUN (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AVMU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMUN.
Performance
AVMU vs. AMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVMU achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than AMUN's 1.48% return.
AVMU
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 1Y
- 5.85%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- 0.45%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.60%
AMUN
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.67K | $39.49K | $71.65K | |
| $784.48K | $745.20K | $589.39K |
AVMU vs. AMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVMU Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF | -0.11% | 1.25% |
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 1.48% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVMU and AMUN is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVMU vs. AMUN — Risk / Return Rank
AVMU
AMUN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AVMU vs. AMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVMU | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.06 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVMU vs. AMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVMU drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, which is greater than AMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVMU and AMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVMU | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.41% | -0.61% | -11.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.38% | 0.00% | -2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -0.07% | -3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | — | — |
Volatility
AVMU vs. AMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVMU | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.63% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.34% | 0.94% | +2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 0.94% | +3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.98% | 0.94% | +3.04% |
AVMU vs. AMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVMU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AMUN's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVMU vs. AMUN - Dividend Comparison
AVMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than AMUN's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 2.13% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AVMU Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF | 3.24% | 3.50% | 3.32% | 2.50% | 1.29% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVMU and AMUN have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVMU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVMU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMUN.
AVMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 2.13% for AMUN.
They also come from different issuers: Avantis and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVMU and 0.25% for AMUN.
Find the right allocation for AVMU and AMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer