CCEP vs. GS
CCEP (Coca-Cola European Partners plc) and GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) are both stocks. CCEP operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while GS operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CCEP returned 13.47%/yr vs 24.48%/yr for GS. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCEP vs. GS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCEP achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly lower than GS's 22.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CCEP has underperformed GS with an annualized return of 13.47%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 24.48% annualized return.
CCEP
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 11.17%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 9.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
GS
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- 12.54%
- YTD
- 22.08%
- 6M
- 20.84%
- 1Y
- 76.70%
- 3Y*
- 49.31%
- 5Y*
- 25.98%
- 10Y*
- 24.48%
CCEP vs. GS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCEP Coca-Cola European Partners plc | 10.70% | 21.20% | 18.35% | 24.50% | 2.33% | 15.61% | 0.48% | 13.85% | 18.58% | 30.72% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 22.08% | 56.64% | 52.03% | 15.91% | -7.87% | 47.61% | 17.45% | 40.48% | -33.53% | 7.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCEP and GS is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 1999 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CCEP and GS has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CCEP:
$44.61B
GS:
$327.33B
CCEP:
€7.47
GS:
$57.41
CCEP:
11.50
GS:
18.51
CCEP:
0.57
GS:
2.40
CCEP:
0.93
GS:
3.02
CCEP:
4.92
GS:
2.66
CCEP:
€41.26B
GS:
$110.77B
CCEP:
€14.63B
GS:
$61.53B
CCEP:
€6.87B
GS:
$24.94B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCEP vs. GS — Risk / Return Rank
CCEP
GS
CCEP vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coca-Cola European Partners plc (CCEP) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCEP | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.41 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 3.80 | -3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | 12.61 | -11.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCEP vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCEP drawdown since its inception was -79.40%, roughly equal to the maximum GS drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEP and GS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCEP | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.40% | -78.84% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.22% | -19.42% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.22% | -30.90% | +12.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.52% | -32.84% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.76% | -48.75% | -0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.08% | -2.73% | -6.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.34% | -22.65% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.03% | 5.84% | +4.19% |
Volatility
CCEP vs. GS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Coca-Cola European Partners plc (CCEP) is 6.82%, while The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a volatility of 11.84%. This indicates that CCEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCEP | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | 11.84% | -5.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.68% | 23.47% | -6.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.46% | 28.55% | -6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.20% | 28.10% | -4.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.38% | 29.87% | -3.49% |
Dividends
CCEP vs. GS - Dividend Comparison
CCEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than GS's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCEP Coca-Cola European Partners plc | 2.41% | 2.57% | 2.77% | 2.95% | 3.07% | 2.90% | 2.01% | 2.71% | 2.73% | 2.97% | 3.65% | 2.27% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.60% | 1.59% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% |
Financials
CCEP vs. GS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coca-Cola European Partners plc and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CCEP vs. GS - Profitability Comparison
CCEP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola European Partners plc reported a gross profit of 3.71B and revenue of 10.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.2%.
GS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.91B and revenue of 17.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.2%.
CCEP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola European Partners plc reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 10.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.
GS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.49B and revenue of 17.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.7%.
CCEP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola European Partners plc reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 10.55B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.
GS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a net income of 5.63B and revenue of 17.23B, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CCEP and GS have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GS has higher volatility (11.84%) compared to CCEP (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCEP dropped -79.40% vs GS's -78.84%.
GS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCEP and GS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer