CCCNX vs. RMLPX
CCCNX (Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund) and RMLPX (Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund) are both mutual funds - CCCNX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Brookfield, while RMLPX is a Infrastructure Equities fund managed by Recurrent. Over the past 5 years, CCCNX returned 21.08%/yr vs 27.53%/yr for RMLPX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CCCNX charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for RMLPX.
Performance
CCCNX vs. RMLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCCNX achieves a 24.46% return, which is significantly lower than RMLPX's 39.36% return.
CCCNX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 16.11%
- YTD
- 24.46%
- 1Y
- 24.90%
- 3Y*
- 24.18%
- 5Y*
- 21.08%
- 10Y*
- 8.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.41%
RMLPX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 7.98%
- 6M
- 27.09%
- YTD
- 39.36%
- 1Y
- 45.90%
- 3Y*
- 28.04%
- 5Y*
- 27.53%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
CCCNX vs. RMLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCCNX Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund | 24.46% | 2.53% | 44.06% | 18.12% | 15.76% | 40.57% | -35.48% | 8.61% | -13.72% |
RMLPX Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund | 39.36% | 8.98% | 30.03% | 16.79% | 35.03% | 42.56% | -28.37% | 15.33% | -15.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCCNX and RMLPX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018 | 0.93 |
The correlation between CCCNX and RMLPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCCNX vs. RMLPX — Risk / Return Rank
CCCNX
RMLPX
CCCNX vs. RMLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) and Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCCNX | RMLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.43 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 4.88 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.44 | 13.01 | -5.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCCNX vs. RMLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCCNX drawdown since its inception was -75.87%, which is greater than RMLPX's maximum drawdown of -66.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCNX and RMLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCCNX | RMLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.87% | -66.95% | -8.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.86% | -9.09% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.06% | -18.75% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.52% | -22.83% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.05% | -2.18% | -1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.19% | -10.14% | -5.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 3.40% | -0.07% |
Volatility
CCCNX vs. RMLPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) is 5.24%, while Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that CCCNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCCNX | RMLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 6.09% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 14.14% | -2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.99% | 17.19% | -2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 21.25% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 27.92% | -0.75% |
CCCNX vs. RMLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCCNX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than RMLPX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCCNX vs. RMLPX - Dividend Comparison
CCCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, less than RMLPX's 4.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCCNX Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund | 4.59% | 5.49% | 5.08% | 5.94% | 5.51% | 7.15% | 15.53% | 12.04% | 11.73% | 9.19% | 9.86% | 8.85% |
RMLPX Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund | 4.67% | 6.38% | 7.63% | 6.49% | 7.08% | 8.89% | 13.48% | 7.25% | 5.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCCNX and RMLPX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMLPX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to CCCNX (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCCNX dropped -75.87% vs RMLPX's -66.95%.
RMLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCCNX and RMLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer