BLRYX vs. REET

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BLRYX (Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund) and REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) are both REIT funds. Over the past 10 years, BLRYX returned 3.18%/yr vs 4.00%/yr for REET. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLRYX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for REET.

Performance

BLRYX vs. REET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund (BLRYX) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLRYX achieves a 7.00% return, which is significantly lower than REET's 8.23% return. Over the past 10 years, BLRYX has underperformed REET with an annualized return of 3.18%, while REET has yielded a comparatively higher 4.00% annualized return.

BLRYX

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: -2.61%
• YTD: 7.00%
• 6M: 7.09%
• 1Y: 11.71%
• 3Y*: 8.54%
• 5Y*: 0.43%
• 10Y*: 3.18%

REET

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -1.47%
• YTD: 8.23%
• 6M: 7.98%
• 1Y: 11.77%
• 3Y*: 9.24%
• 5Y*: 2.30%
• 10Y*: 4.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLRYX vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BLRYX Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund	7.00%	10.99%	1.21%	7.11%	-22.02%	23.74%	-10.36%	20.46%	-8.13%	10.20%
REET iShares Global REIT ETF	8.23%	7.97%	2.65%	10.28%	-24.10%	32.43%	-10.48%	24.42%	-5.27%	7.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BLRYX and REET is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2014	0.94

The correlation between BLRYX and REET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BLRYX vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLRYX

BLRYX Risk / Return Rank: 13
BLRYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
BLRYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
BLRYX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
BLRYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
BLRYX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

REET

REET Risk / Return Rank: 28
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 26
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLRYX vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund (BLRYX) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLRYX	REET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	0.98	+0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	1.39	+0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.18	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	1.34	-0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.50	4.85	-0.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BLRYX vs. REET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLRYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the REET Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLRYX and REET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLRYX	REET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	0.98	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	0.14	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	0.21	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.25	+0.13

Drawdowns

BLRYX vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLRYX drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, roughly equal to the maximum REET drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLRYX and REET.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLRYX	REET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.17%	-44.59%	+1.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.68%	-9.04%	-1.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.54%	-18.02%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.85%	-32.11%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.17%	-44.59%	+1.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.93%	-2.68%	-1.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.29%	-9.79%	+1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.77%	2.50%	+0.27%

Volatility

BLRYX vs. REET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund (BLRYX) is 3.68%, while iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that BLRYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLRYX	REET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.68%	3.88%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.05%	8.87%	+0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.07%	12.10%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.59%	16.96%	-0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.88%	18.84%	-0.96%

BLRYX vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLRYX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than REET's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLRYX vs. REET - Dividend Comparison

BLRYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than REET's 3.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLRYX Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund	3.15%	2.55%	2.72%	1.86%	2.08%	2.25%	3.59%	4.91%	4.32%	3.92%	6.25%	4.08%
REET iShares Global REIT ETF	3.42%	3.67%	3.64%	3.27%	2.43%	3.18%	2.65%	5.25%	5.73%	3.84%	5.37%	3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLRYX and REET in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, BLRYX and REET move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BLRYX or REET?

REET has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to BLRYX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLRYX dropped -43.17% vs REET's -44.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLRYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.