PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCB vs. FBMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCB vs. FBMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) and The First Bancshares, Inc. (FBMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CCB

1D
-0.94%
1M
-7.49%
YTD
-38.33%
6M
-34.24%
1Y
-19.17%
3Y*
23.38%
5Y*
17.88%
10Y*

FBMS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCB vs. FBMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CCB
Coastal Financial Corporation
-38.33%34.95%91.20%-6.54%-6.12%141.05%27.50%8.14%-7.13%
FBMS
The First Bancshares, Inc.
0.00%-2.76%23.60%-5.37%-15.21%26.97%-11.48%18.56%-16.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CCB and FBMS is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018

0.48

The correlation between CCB and FBMS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCB:

$422.59M

FBMS:

$412.55M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCB:

$195.03M

FBMS:

$203.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

CCB:

$52.74M

FBMS:

$108.17M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCB vs. FBMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCB
CCB Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCB Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
CCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCB Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FBMS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCB vs. FBMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) and The First Bancshares, Inc. (FBMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCBFBMSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.94

CCB vs. FBMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCBFBMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

Drawdowns

CCB vs. FBMS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCBFBMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.77%

Volatility

CCB vs. FBMS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCBFBMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.93%

Dividends

CCB vs. FBMS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CCB nor FBMS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCB
Coastal Financial Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBMS
The First Bancshares, Inc.
0.00%0.74%2.86%3.07%2.31%1.50%1.36%0.87%0.66%0.44%0.55%0.82%

Financials

CCB vs. FBMS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coastal Financial Corporation and The First Bancshares, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M202220232024202520260
97.88M
(CCB) Total Revenue
(FBMS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CCB and FBMS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCB and FBMS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer