CCB vs. FBMS
CCB (Coastal Financial Corporation) and FBMS (The First Bancshares, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCB vs. FBMS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CCB
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- -38.33%
- 6M
- -34.24%
- 1Y
- -19.17%
- 3Y*
- 23.38%
- 5Y*
- 17.88%
- 10Y*
- —
FBMS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCB vs. FBMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCB Coastal Financial Corporation | -38.33% | 34.95% | 91.20% | -6.54% | -6.12% | 141.05% | 27.50% | 8.14% | -7.13% |
FBMS The First Bancshares, Inc. | 0.00% | -2.76% | 23.60% | -5.37% | -15.21% | 26.97% | -11.48% | 18.56% | -16.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCB and FBMS is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018 | 0.48 |
The correlation between CCB and FBMS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CCB:
$422.59M
FBMS:
$412.55M
CCB:
$195.03M
FBMS:
$203.18M
CCB:
$52.74M
FBMS:
$108.17M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCB vs. FBMS — Risk / Return Rank
CCB
FBMS
CCB vs. FBMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) and The First Bancshares, Inc. (FBMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCB | FBMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCB | FBMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | — | — |
Drawdowns
CCB vs. FBMS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCB | FBMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.60% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.60% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.77% | — | — |
Volatility
CCB vs. FBMS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCB | FBMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.30% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.64% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.32% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.93% | — | — |
Dividends
CCB vs. FBMS - Dividend Comparison
Neither CCB nor FBMS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCB Coastal Financial Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FBMS The First Bancshares, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.86% | 3.07% | 2.31% | 1.50% | 1.36% | 0.87% | 0.66% | 0.44% | 0.55% | 0.82% |
Financials
CCB vs. FBMS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coastal Financial Corporation and The First Bancshares, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CCB and FBMS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CCB and FBMS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer