CC1U.L vs. SEML.L
CC1U.L (Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD) and SEML.L (iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CC1U.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD, while SEML.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CC1U.L returned -0.24%/yr vs 1.42%/yr for SEML.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CC1U.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SEML.L.
Performance
CC1U.L vs. SEML.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CC1U.L is traded in USD, while SEML.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SEML.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CC1U.L achieves a -4.94% return, which is significantly lower than SEML.L's 0.60% return.
CC1U.L
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -6.79%
- YTD
- -4.94%
- 6M
- -5.30%
- 1Y
- 19.79%
- 3Y*
- 4.10%
- 5Y*
- -0.24%
- 10Y*
- —
SEML.L
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 7.12%
- 3Y*
- 6.38%
- 5Y*
- 1.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.49%
CC1U.L vs. SEML.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC1U.L Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD | -4.94% | 39.49% | 1.53% | -11.33% | -9.32% | -3.10% | -1.85% | 12.90% | -13.77% |
SEML.L iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF | 0.60% | 18.63% | -2.84% | 10.98% | -10.90% | -10.30% | 1.47% | 12.55% | 0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CC1U.L and SEML.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2018 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CC1U.L vs. SEML.L — Risk / Return Rank
CC1U.L
SEML.L
CC1U.L vs. SEML.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CC1U.L | SEML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.18 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 1.11 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.48 | 3.52 | -1.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CC1U.L vs. SEML.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CC1U.L drawdown since its inception was -45.32%, smaller than the maximum SEML.L drawdown of -50.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CC1U.L and SEML.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CC1U.L | SEML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.32% | -50.31% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.29% | -6.39% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.67% | -9.04% | -30.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.86% | -25.24% | -17.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.63% | -27.66% | +13.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.00% | -37.95% | +21.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.95% | 2.02% | +5.93% |
Volatility
CC1U.L vs. SEML.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) at 2.32%. This indicates that CC1U.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEML.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CC1U.L | SEML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 2.32% | +5.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.47% | 6.37% | +10.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.39% | 7.35% | +16.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.27% | 9.49% | +17.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.45% | 10.19% | +15.26% |
CC1U.L vs. SEML.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CC1U.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SEML.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CC1U.L vs. SEML.L - Dividend Comparison
CC1U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC1U.L Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEML.L iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF | 6.74% | 5.44% | 5.56% | 5.05% | 5.25% | 4.58% | 5.13% | 5.44% | 7.30% | 6.75% | 6.78% | 5.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CC1U.L and SEML.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CC1U.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CC1U.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SEML.L.
CC1U.L is categorized as China Equities, while SEML.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. CC1U.L tracks MSCI China NR USD, while SEML.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CC1U.L and 0.50% for SEML.L.
Find the right allocation for CC1U.L and SEML.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer