CC1U.L vs. ICGA.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L) and iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE).
CC1U.L and ICGA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CC1U.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. ICGA.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China. It was launched on Jun 20, 2019. Both CC1U.L and ICGA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CC1U.L vs. ICGA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CC1U.L vs. ICGA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC1U.L Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD | -4.61% | 39.49% | 1.53% | -11.33% | -9.32% | -3.10% | -1.85% | 3.79% |
ICGA.DE iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc | -7.33% | 31.68% | 20.00% | -12.01% | -19.85% | -23.80% | 26.58% | 12.37% |
Different Trading Currencies
CC1U.L is traded in USD, while ICGA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ICGA.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CC1U.L achieves a -4.61% return, which is significantly higher than ICGA.DE's -7.33% return.
CC1U.L
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- -4.61%
- 6M
- -13.25%
- 1Y
- 21.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- -0.07%
- 10Y*
- 3.50%
ICGA.DE
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- -7.33%
- 6M
- -13.75%
- 1Y
- 5.29%
- 3Y*
- 7.15%
- 5Y*
- -5.25%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CC1U.L vs. ICGA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CC1U.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ICGA.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CC1U.L vs. ICGA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CC1U.L
ICGA.DE
CC1U.L vs. ICGA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L) and iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CC1U.L | ICGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.24 | +0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 0.47 | +0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.06 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 0.36 | +1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.28 | 0.97 | +2.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CC1U.L | ICGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.24 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | -0.18 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.06 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between CC1U.L and ICGA.DE is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CC1U.L vs. ICGA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CC1U.L nor ICGA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CC1U.L vs. ICGA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CC1U.L drawdown since its inception was -51.06%, smaller than the maximum ICGA.DE drawdown of -62.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CC1U.L and ICGA.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CC1U.L | ICGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.06% | -55.95% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.45% | -16.12% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.50% | -49.92% | +6.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.10% | -32.01% | +16.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.43% | -28.74% | +6.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.71% | 6.47% | +0.24% |
Volatility
CC1U.L vs. ICGA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L) and iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE) have volatilities of 6.27% and 6.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CC1U.L | ICGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.27% | 6.43% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.20% | 13.72% | +2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.38% | 22.06% | +3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.62% | 29.13% | -2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 28.30% | -4.15% |