PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBXO vs. JULB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBXO vs. JULB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBXO achieves a -3.67% return, which is significantly lower than JULB's 6.35% return.


CBXO

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
-3.67%
6M
-5.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JULB

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.40%
YTD
6.35%
6M
6.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBXO vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBXO and JULB is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBXO vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CBXO vs. JULB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBXOJULBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-2.36

2.17

-4.53

Drawdowns

CBXO vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBXO drawdown since its inception was -11.40%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBXO and JULB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBXOJULBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.40%

-5.24%

-6.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.40%

-0.07%

-11.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-0.87%

-7.59%

Volatility

CBXO vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBXOJULBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.23%

6.81%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.23%

6.81%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.23%

6.81%

+0.42%

CBXO vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBXO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBXO vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison

CBXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while JULB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBXO and JULB have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBXO.

CBXO has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for JULB.

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBXO and 0.25% for JULB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBXO and JULB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer