CBXJ vs. BWOW
CBXJ (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) and BWOW (Bitwise Dogecoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBXJ is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Calamos, while BWOW is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the DOGE/USD Exchange Rate - Benchmark Price Return. CBXJ is actively managed, while BWOW is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CBXJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for BWOW.
Performance
CBXJ vs. BWOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBXJ achieves a -10.13% return, which is significantly higher than BWOW's -21.75% return.
CBXJ
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- -10.13%
- 6M
- -15.21%
- 1Y
- -20.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BWOW
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- -16.98%
- YTD
- -21.75%
- 6M
- -39.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXJ vs. BWOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January | -10.13% | -4.27% |
BWOW Bitwise Dogecoin ETF | -21.75% | -24.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBXJ and BWOW is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBXJ vs. BWOW — Risk / Return Rank
CBXJ
BWOW
CBXJ vs. BWOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ) and Bitwise Dogecoin ETF (BWOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBXJ | BWOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBXJ | BWOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.79 | -0.87 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
CBXJ vs. BWOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBXJ drawdown since its inception was -28.02%, smaller than the maximum BWOW drawdown of -42.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBXJ and BWOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBXJ | BWOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.02% | -42.77% | +14.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.02% | -41.02% | +13.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.68% | -28.82% | +18.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.11% | — | — |
Volatility
CBXJ vs. BWOW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBXJ | BWOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.94% | 74.31% | -56.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 74.31% | -57.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 74.31% | -57.60% |
CBXJ vs. BWOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBXJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than BWOW's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBXJ vs. BWOW - Dividend Comparison
CBXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, while BWOW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BWOW Bitwise Dogecoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January | 2.19% | 1.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBXJ and BWOW have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BWOW is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BWOW is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBXJ.
CBXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.00% for BWOW.
CBXJ is categorized as Blockchain, while BWOW is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBXJ and 0.34% for BWOW.
Find the right allocation for CBXJ and BWOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer