CBXJ vs. BLCN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CBXJ (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) and BLCN (Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBXJ is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Calamos, while BLCN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren NASDAQ Blockchain Economy Index. CBXJ is actively managed, while BLCN is passively managed. Over the past year, CBXJ returned -21.37% vs 25.25% for BLCN. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBXJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BLCN.

Performance

CBXJ vs. BLCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ) and Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBXJ achieves a -11.67% return, which is significantly lower than BLCN's 8.85% return.

CBXJ

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -6.08%
• YTD: -11.67%
• 6M: -12.37%
• 1Y: -21.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLCN

• 1D: -3.41%
• 1M: 6.21%
• YTD: 8.85%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 25.25%
• 3Y*: 8.68%
• 5Y*: -10.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBXJ vs. BLCN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-11.67%	-7.64%
BLCN Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF	8.85%	-2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CBXJ and BLCN is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

CBXJ vs. BLCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBXJ

CBXJ Risk / Return Rank: 2
CBXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CBXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CBXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CBXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BLCN

BLCN Risk / Return Rank: 20
BLCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BLCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
BLCN Omega Ratio Rank: 21
BLCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
BLCN Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBXJ vs. BLCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ) and Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBXJ	BLCN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.21	0.69	-1.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.66	1.18	-2.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.14	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.73	0.86	-1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.17	1.81	-2.98

CBXJ vs. BLCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBXJ Sharpe Ratio is -1.21, which is lower than the BLCN Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBXJ and BLCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CBXJ vs. BLCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBXJ drawdown since its inception was -29.25%, smaller than the maximum BLCN drawdown of -67.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBXJ and BLCN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBXJ	BLCN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.25%	-67.51%	+38.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.25%	-29.53%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-45.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.25%	-47.17%	+17.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.33%	-30.38%	+19.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.30%	13.97%	+4.33%

Volatility

CBXJ vs. BLCN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ) is 3.06%, while Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) has a volatility of 14.35%. This indicates that CBXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBXJ	BLCN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.06%	14.35%	-11.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.42%	27.56%	-16.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.78%	36.88%	-19.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.49%	35.21%	-18.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.49%	31.32%	-14.83%

CBXJ vs. BLCN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBXJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCN's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBXJ vs. BLCN - Dividend Comparison

CBXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than BLCN's 2.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLCN Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF	2.77%	3.01%	0.67%	0.54%	1.28%	0.56%	0.58%	1.45%	1.16%
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	2.23%	1.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBXJ and BLCN in my portfolio?

CBXJ and BLCN have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBXJ or BLCN?

BLCN has higher volatility (14.35%) compared to CBXJ (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBXJ dropped -29.25% vs BLCN's -67.51%.

Which ETF is better, CBXJ or BLCN?

On 1-year performance, BLCN leads with 25.25% vs -21.37% for CBXJ. On fees, BLCN is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, CBXJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CBXJ or BLCN?

Over the 1-year period, BLCN has performed better with a 25.25% return vs -21.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBXJ or BLCN?

BLCN is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBXJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBXJ or BLCN?

BLCN has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 2.23% for CBXJ.

What is the main difference between CBXJ and BLCN?

CBXJ is categorized as Blockchain, while BLCN is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBXJ and 0.68% for BLCN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.