CBXA vs. JULB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CBXA (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. CBXA is passively managed, while JULB is actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CBXA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.

Performance

CBXA vs. JULB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBXA) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBXA achieves a -20.06% return, which is significantly lower than JULB's 6.35% return.

CBXA

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: -5.65%
• YTD: -20.06%
• 6M: -21.86%
• 1Y: -21.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULB

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: 6.35%
• 6M: 6.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBXA vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CBXA Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	-20.06%	-6.92%
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	6.35%	2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CBXA and JULB is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.52

Return for Risk

CBXA vs. JULB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBXA

CBXA Risk / Return Rank: 1
CBXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CBXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CBXA Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CBXA Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBXA vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBXA) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CBXA	JULB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.20	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.61	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.52	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CBXA	JULB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.63	2.17	-2.80

Drawdowns

CBXA vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBXA drawdown since its inception was -27.22%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBXA and JULB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBXA	JULB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.22%	-5.24%	-21.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.22%	-0.07%	-27.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.69%	-0.87%	-7.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.07%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CBXA	JULB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.81%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.53%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.98%	6.81%	+11.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.13%	6.81%	+10.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.13%	6.81%	+10.32%

CBXA vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBXA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBXA vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison

CBXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, while JULB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CBXA Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	2.47%	1.97%
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBXA and JULB in my portfolio?

CBXA and JULB have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CBXA or JULB?

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBXA or JULB?

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBXA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBXA or JULB?

CBXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 0.00% for JULB.

What is the main difference between CBXA and JULB?

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBXA and 0.25% for JULB.