CBUV.DE vs. NQSE.DE
CBUV.DE (iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and NQSE.DE (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBUV.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global Metaverse, while NQSE.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUV.DE returned 21.34%/yr vs 25.27%/yr for NQSE.DE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CBUV.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for NQSE.DE.
Performance
CBUV.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUV.DE achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly lower than NQSE.DE's 17.82% return.
CBUV.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 4.62%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 17.36%
- 3Y*
- 21.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NQSE.DE
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- YTD
- 17.82%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 35.67%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- —
CBUV.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUV.DE iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.62% | 8.91% | 30.32% | 51.01% |
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 17.82% | 18.16% | 24.07% | 46.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUV.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2023 | 0.81 |
The correlation between CBUV.DE and NQSE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUV.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUV.DE
NQSE.DE
CBUV.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUV.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.39 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 3.08 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.10 | 10.77 | -8.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUV.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 2.28 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.82 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
CBUV.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUV.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.66%, smaller than the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUV.DE and NQSE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUV.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.66% | -37.67% | +10.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.30% | -11.87% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.66% | -22.40% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.31% | -0.84% | -3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -8.56% | +3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.59% | 3.40% | +5.19% |
Volatility
CBUV.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) is 4.51%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that CBUV.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUV.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 4.75% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.91% | 11.99% | +0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.70% | 16.05% | +2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 20.91% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 21.54% | -1.28% |
CBUV.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUV.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBUV.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUV.DE nor NQSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUV.DE and NQSE.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NQSE.DE is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NQSE.DE is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CBUV.DE.
CBUV.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while NQSE.DE is Nasdaq-100. CBUV.DE tracks STOXX Global Metaverse, while NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CBUV.DE and 0.33% for NQSE.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUV.DE and NQSE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer