CBUV.DE vs. LSMC.DE
CBUV.DE (iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBUV.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global Metaverse, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUV.DE returned 21.34%/yr vs 62.06%/yr for LSMC.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CBUV.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
CBUV.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUV.DE achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return.
CBUV.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 4.62%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 17.36%
- 3Y*
- 21.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 12.86%
- YTD
- 63.83%
- 6M
- 63.41%
- 1Y
- 126.99%
- 3Y*
- 62.06%
- 5Y*
- 36.20%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
CBUV.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUV.DE iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.62% | 8.91% | 30.32% | 51.01% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.83% | 32.60% | 66.54% | 59.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUV.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2023 | 0.73 |
The correlation between CBUV.DE and LSMC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUV.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUV.DE
LSMC.DE
CBUV.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUV.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.59 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 10.37 | -9.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.10 | 32.83 | -30.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUV.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 4.27 | -3.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.82 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
CBUV.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUV.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.66%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUV.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUV.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.66% | -39.77% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.30% | -12.53% | -7.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.66% | -36.22% | +8.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.31% | -3.34% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -9.37% | +4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.59% | 3.96% | +4.63% |
Volatility
CBUV.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) is 4.51%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that CBUV.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUV.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 11.23% | -6.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.91% | 22.18% | -9.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.70% | 30.40% | -11.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 31.21% | -10.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 26.06% | -5.80% |
CBUV.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUV.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBUV.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUV.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUV.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LSMC.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LSMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CBUV.DE.
CBUV.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. CBUV.DE tracks STOXX Global Metaverse, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CBUV.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUV.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer