CBUV.DE vs. KROP.DE
CBUV.DE (iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and KROP.DE (Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds - CBUV.DE tracks the STOXX Global Metaverse while KROP.DE tracks the Solactive AgTech and Food Innovation. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUV.DE returned 21.34%/yr vs -2.05%/yr for KROP.DE. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
CBUV.DE vs. KROP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUV.DE achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly lower than KROP.DE's 17.14% return.
CBUV.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 4.62%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 17.36%
- 3Y*
- 21.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KROP.DE
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 17.14%
- 6M
- 13.93%
- 1Y
- 9.93%
- 3Y*
- -2.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBUV.DE vs. KROP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUV.DE iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.62% | 8.91% | 30.32% | 51.01% |
KROP.DE Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 17.14% | -4.87% | -2.79% | -30.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUV.DE and KROP.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2023 | 0.32 |
The correlation between CBUV.DE and KROP.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUV.DE vs. KROP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUV.DE
KROP.DE
CBUV.DE vs. KROP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUV.DE | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.12 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 1.04 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.10 | 2.21 | -0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUV.DE | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.62 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | -0.47 | +1.79 |
Drawdowns
CBUV.DE vs. KROP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUV.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.66%, smaller than the maximum KROP.DE drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUV.DE and KROP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUV.DE | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.66% | -52.74% | +25.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.30% | -9.22% | -11.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.66% | -27.28% | -0.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.31% | -41.08% | +36.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -36.46% | +31.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.59% | 4.34% | +4.25% |
Volatility
CBUV.DE vs. KROP.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) is 4.51%, while Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that CBUV.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KROP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUV.DE | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 5.58% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.91% | 12.02% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.70% | 15.43% | +3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 19.64% | +0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 19.64% | +0.62% |
CBUV.DE vs. KROP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CBUV.DE and KROP.DE have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
CBUV.DE vs. KROP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUV.DE nor KROP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUV.DE and KROP.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUV.DE and KROP.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
CBUV.DE tracks STOXX Global Metaverse, while KROP.DE tracks Solactive AgTech and Food Innovation. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X.
Find the right allocation for CBUV.DE and KROP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer