CBUV.DE vs. ETLH.DE
CBUV.DE (iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ETLH.DE (L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - CBUV.DE tracks the STOXX Global Metaverse while ETLH.DE tracks the Solactive eCommerce Logistics. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUV.DE returned 21.34%/yr vs 5.96%/yr for ETLH.DE. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CBUV.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ETLH.DE.
Performance
CBUV.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUV.DE achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly higher than ETLH.DE's 0.49% return.
CBUV.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 4.62%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 17.36%
- 3Y*
- 21.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETLH.DE
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 1.45%
- 1Y
- 4.62%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.34%
- 10Y*
- —
CBUV.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUV.DE iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.62% | 8.91% | 30.32% | 51.01% |
ETLH.DE L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF | 0.49% | -0.43% | 8.79% | 10.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUV.DE and ETLH.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2023 | 0.71 |
The correlation between CBUV.DE and ETLH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUV.DE vs. ETLH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUV.DE
ETLH.DE
CBUV.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) and L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUV.DE | ETLH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.06 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 0.37 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.10 | 0.96 | +1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUV.DE | ETLH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.32 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.56 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
CBUV.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUV.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.66%, roughly equal to the maximum ETLH.DE drawdown of -27.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUV.DE and ETLH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUV.DE | ETLH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.66% | -27.60% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.30% | -12.61% | -7.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.66% | -25.70% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.31% | -7.50% | +3.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -8.28% | +3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.59% | 4.89% | +3.70% |
Volatility
CBUV.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE) at 4.00%. This indicates that CBUV.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUV.DE | ETLH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 4.00% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.91% | 10.62% | +2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.70% | 14.85% | +3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 16.60% | +3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 17.49% | +2.77% |
CBUV.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUV.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLH.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBUV.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUV.DE nor ETLH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUV.DE and ETLH.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETLH.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETLH.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CBUV.DE.
CBUV.DE tracks STOXX Global Metaverse, while ETLH.DE tracks Solactive eCommerce Logistics. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CBUV.DE and 0.49% for ETLH.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUV.DE and ETLH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer