PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUS vs. OMER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CBUS vs. OMER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cibus Global LLC (CBUS) and Omeros Corporation (OMER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUS achieves a -25.29% return, which is significantly higher than OMER's -39.85% return.


CBUS

1D
-4.41%
1M
-5.80%
YTD
-25.29%
6M
-26.14%
1Y
-13.33%
3Y*
-54.05%
5Y*
10Y*

OMER

1D
0.49%
1M
-9.86%
YTD
-39.85%
6M
8.62%
1Y
221.81%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
-7.74%
10Y*
0.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUS vs. OMER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CBUS
Cibus Global LLC
-25.29%-37.41%-85.85%-37.65%
OMER
Omeros Corporation
-39.85%73.84%202.14%-47.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUS and OMER is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2023

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CBUS:

$847.63M

OMER:

$656.06M

EPS

CBUS:

-$0.34

OMER:

-$0.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

CBUS:

$4.29M

OMER:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

CBUS:

-$164.00K

OMER:

-$10.29M

EBITDA (TTM)

CBUS:

-$34.28M

OMER:

-$110.44M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUS vs. OMER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUS
CBUS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

OMER
OMER Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
OMER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMER Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMER Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
OMER Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMER Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUS vs. OMER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cibus Global LLC (CBUS) and Omeros Corporation (OMER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBUSOMERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.52

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

4.54

-4.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.38

9.27

-9.66

CBUS vs. OMER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUS Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the OMER Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUS and OMER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBUS vs. OMER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUS drawdown since its inception was -96.32%, roughly equal to the maximum OMER drawdown of -95.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUS and OMER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUSOMERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.32%

-95.95%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.37%

-49.14%

-21.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.14%

-81.09%

-14.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.87%

-61.30%

-34.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.47%

-48.52%

-26.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.95%

24.03%

+10.92%

Volatility

CBUS vs. OMER - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cibus Global LLC (CBUS) is 16.95%, while Omeros Corporation (OMER) has a volatility of 21.18%. This indicates that CBUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUSOMERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.95%

21.18%

-4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

90.00%

73.38%

+16.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.74%

187.42%

-82.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.49%

134.91%

-25.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.49%

111.00%

-1.51%

Dividends

CBUS vs. OMER - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBUS nor OMER has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CBUS vs. OMER - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cibus Global LLC and Omeros Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-80.00M-60.00M-40.00M-20.00M0.0020.00M20222023202420252026
1.68M
0
(CBUS) Total Revenue
(OMER) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUS and OMER have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OMER has higher volatility (21.18%) compared to CBUS (16.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBUS dropped -96.32% vs OMER's -95.95%.

OMER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUS and OMER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer