PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUS vs. ZTEK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CBUS vs. ZTEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cibus Global LLC (CBUS) and ZEN Graphene Solutions Ltd (ZTEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUS achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly higher than ZTEK's 5.30% return.


CBUS

1D
-2.07%
1M
35.97%
6M
-9.13%
YTD
8.62%
1Y
26.85%
3Y*
-55.67%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-58.80%

ZTEK

1D
-0.90%
1M
49.42%
6M
6.19%
YTD
5.30%
1Y
-18.14%
3Y*
-24.88%
5Y*
-21.70%
10Y*
2.63%
ALL TIME*
0.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$286.61K$902.55K$550.11K
$94.70K$89.66K$121.79K

CBUS vs. ZTEK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CBUS
Cibus Global LLC
8.62%-37.41%-85.85%-37.65%
ZTEK
ZEN Graphene Solutions Ltd
5.30%-31.91%-12.96%-34.94%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUS and ZTEK is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2023

0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CBUS:

$85.97M

ZTEK:

$85.33M

EPS

CBUS:

-$0.26

ZTEK:

-CA$0.09

PS Ratio

CBUS:

170.88

ZTEK:

634.72

PB Ratio

CBUS:

34.73

ZTEK:

10.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

CBUS:

$4.29M

ZTEK:

CA$166.09K

Gross Profit (TTM)

CBUS:

-$164.00K

ZTEK:

-CA$4.19M

EBITDA (TTM)

CBUS:

-$34.28M

ZTEK:

-CA$9.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUS vs. ZTEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CBUS
CBUS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

ZTEK
ZTEK Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ZTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CBUS vs. ZTEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cibus Global LLC (CBUS) and ZEN Graphene Solutions Ltd (ZTEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBUSZTEKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.06

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

-0.28

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.69

-0.48

+1.17

CBUS vs. ZTEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is higher than the ZTEK Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUS and ZTEK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBUS vs. ZTEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUS drawdown since its inception was -96.32%, roughly equal to the maximum ZTEK drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUS and ZTEK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUSZTEKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.32%

-93.45%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.37%

-64.81%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.92%

-79.04%

-15.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.00%

-88.17%

-5.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.16%

-59.95%

-16.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.14%

37.47%

+1.67%

Volatility

CBUS vs. ZTEK - Volatility Comparison

Cibus Global LLC (CBUS) has a higher volatility of 34.53% compared to ZEN Graphene Solutions Ltd (ZTEK) at 28.92%. This indicates that CBUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZTEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUSZTEKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.53%

28.92%

+5.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

88.62%

81.01%

+7.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

108.96%

104.59%

+4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.45%

81.55%

+27.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.45%

86.55%

+22.90%

Dividends

CBUS vs. ZTEK - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBUS nor ZTEK has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CBUS vs. ZTEK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cibus Global LLC and ZEN Graphene Solutions Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUS and ZTEK have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBUS has higher volatility (34.53%) compared to ZTEK (28.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBUS dropped -96.32% vs ZTEK's -93.45%.

CBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUS and ZTEK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer