CBUS vs. GBIL
CBUS (Cibus Global LLC) is a stock, while GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. Over the past 3 years, CBUS returned -54.05%/yr vs 4.58%/yr for GBIL. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CBUS vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUS achieves a -25.29% return, which is significantly lower than GBIL's 1.56% return.
CBUS
- 1D
- -4.41%
- 1M
- -5.80%
- YTD
- -25.29%
- 6M
- -26.14%
- 1Y
- -13.33%
- 3Y*
- -54.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GBIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 3.82%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.35%
- 10Y*
- —
CBUS vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUS Cibus Global LLC | -25.29% | -37.41% | -85.85% | -37.65% |
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 1.56% | 4.12% | 5.24% | 3.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUS and GBIL is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2023 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUS vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank
CBUS
GBIL
CBUS vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cibus Global LLC (CBUS) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBUS | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -16.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -103.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 42.70 | -41.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 191.74 | -191.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 1,625.53 | -1,625.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBUS vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUS drawdown since its inception was -96.32%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUS and GBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUS | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.32% | -0.76% | -95.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.37% | -0.02% | -70.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.14% | -0.76% | -94.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.87% | 0.00% | -95.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.47% | -0.04% | -75.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.95% | 0.00% | +34.95% |
Volatility
CBUS vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison
Cibus Global LLC (CBUS) has a higher volatility of 16.95% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that CBUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUS | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.95% | 0.05% | +16.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 90.00% | 0.14% | +89.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.74% | 0.23% | +104.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.49% | 0.58% | +108.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 109.49% | 0.47% | +109.02% |
Dividends
CBUS vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison
CBUS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUS Cibus Global LLC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 3.74% | 4.02% | 4.93% | 4.77% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 2.20% | 1.70% | 0.74% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUS and GBIL have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBUS has higher volatility (16.95%) compared to GBIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBUS dropped -96.32% vs GBIL's -0.76%.
GBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.83 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBUS and GBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer