CBUK.DE vs. M37R.DE
CBUK.DE (iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc) and M37R.DE (HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - CBUK.DE tracks the MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries ESG Screened Select Capped while M37R.DE tracks the Solactive ETC Group Global Metaverse. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. CBUK.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for M37R.DE.
Performance
CBUK.DE vs. M37R.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CBUK.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- 6M
- -9.26%
- YTD
- -5.26%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- 10.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.48%
M37R.DE
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CBUK.DE vs. M37R.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CBUK.DE iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc | -4.16% |
M37R.DE HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF | 1.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUK.DE and M37R.DE is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2026 | -1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUK.DE vs. M37R.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUK.DE
M37R.DE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CBUK.DE vs. M37R.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) and HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBUK.DE | M37R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBUK.DE vs. M37R.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUK.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, which is greater than M37R.DE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUK.DE and M37R.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUK.DE | M37R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.29% | 0.00% | -37.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.17% | 0.00% | -18.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | 0.00% | -16.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.75% | — | — |
Volatility
CBUK.DE vs. M37R.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUK.DE | M37R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.13% | 5.16% | +19.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.52% | 5.16% | +26.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.52% | 5.16% | +26.36% |
CBUK.DE vs. M37R.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUK.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than M37R.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBUK.DE vs. M37R.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUK.DE nor M37R.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUK.DE and M37R.DE have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUK.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUK.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for M37R.DE.
CBUK.DE tracks MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries ESG Screened Select Capped, while M37R.DE tracks Solactive ETC Group Global Metaverse. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CBUK.DE and 0.65% for M37R.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUK.DE and M37R.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer