CBUF.DE vs. IS3N.DE
CBUF.DE (iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist) and IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CBUF.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped, while IS3N.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CBUF.DE returned 4.66%/yr vs 8.61%/yr for IS3N.DE. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.
Performance
CBUF.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUF.DE achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 25.82% return.
CBUF.DE
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- 3.91%
- YTD
- -2.22%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- 0.62%
- 5Y*
- 4.66%
- 10Y*
- —
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 26.34%
- 1Y
- 45.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
CBUF.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | -2.22% | 2.56% | 0.75% | 0.33% | 2.09% | 30.42% | 2.79% | 11.42% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 25.82% | 17.14% | 13.87% | 7.20% | -14.09% | 7.38% | 7.07% | 8.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUF.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019 | 0.37 |
The correlation between CBUF.DE and IS3N.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUF.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUF.DE
IS3N.DE
CBUF.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUF.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.49 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 4.42 | -3.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.56 | 16.00 | -14.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUF.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 2.69 | -2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.53 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
CBUF.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUF.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.94%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUF.DE and IS3N.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUF.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.94% | -35.06% | +9.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -10.52% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.76% | -19.17% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.76% | -22.01% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.66% | -2.49% | -7.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -9.30% | +3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | 2.91% | +1.83% |
Volatility
CBUF.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) is 4.98%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that CBUF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUF.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 7.16% | -2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 14.69% | -4.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.98% | 17.32% | -3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 16.19% | -2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 18.04% | -2.68% |
CBUF.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CBUF.DE and IS3N.DE have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CBUF.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
CBUF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while IS3N.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.08% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.05% | 1.27% | 0.10% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUF.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUF.DE and IS3N.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.
CBUF.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. CBUF.DE tracks MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI).
Find the right allocation for CBUF.DE and IS3N.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer