CBUF.DE vs. XDWH.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE).

CBUF.DE and XDWH.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CBUF.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped. It was launched on Oct 17, 2019. XDWH.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Mar 4, 2016. Both CBUF.DE and XDWH.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CBUF.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CBUF.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist	-3.16%	2.56%	0.75%	0.33%	2.09%	30.42%	2.79%	11.42%
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C	-2.43%	2.21%	7.44%	0.04%	-0.07%	30.55%	2.69%	11.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUF.DE achieves a -3.16% return, which is significantly lower than XDWH.DE's -2.43% return.

CBUF.DE

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -3.75%
• YTD: -3.16%
• 6M: 3.71%
• 1Y: -0.06%
• 3Y*: 1.12%
• 5Y*: 4.83%
• 10Y*: —

XDWH.DE

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -3.56%
• YTD: -2.43%
• 6M: 4.67%
• 1Y: 0.11%
• 3Y*: 3.43%
• 5Y*: 5.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUF.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUF.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XDWH.DE

Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C

CBUF.DE

iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist

Return for Risk

CBUF.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUF.DE

CBUF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 12
CBUF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
CBUF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
CBUF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
CBUF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
CBUF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 13

XDWH.DE

XDWH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 13
XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
XDWH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
XDWH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
XDWH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
XDWH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUF.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CBUF.DE	XDWH.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.00	0.01	-0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.11	0.12	-0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.02	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.15	0.22	-0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.35	0.51	-0.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CBUF.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUF.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUF.DE and XDWH.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CBUF.DE	XDWH.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00	0.01	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.43	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.56	-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between CBUF.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CBUF.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison

CBUF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, while XDWH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist	1.09%	1.06%	1.02%	1.16%	1.09%	1.05%	1.27%	0.10%
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CBUF.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUF.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.94%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWH.DE drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUF.DE and XDWH.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBUF.DE	XDWH.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.94%	-26.08%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.34%	-11.72%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.76%	-21.12%	-0.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.54%	-8.93%	-1.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.49%	-4.72%	-0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	3.74%	+0.19%

Volatility

CBUF.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) have volatilities of 4.17% and 3.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBUF.DE	XDWH.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	3.99%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.63%	8.45%	+0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.57%	16.42%	+0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.45%	13.28%	+0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.33%	14.71%	+0.62%