CBU0.DE vs. CEMF.DE
CBU0.DE (iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) and CEMF.DE (iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CBU0.DE is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged), while CEMF.DE is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year (EUR Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CBU0.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CEMF.DE.
Performance
CBU0.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBU0.DE achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly higher than CEMF.DE's -1.42% return.
CBU0.DE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- -0.89%
- 6M
- -0.90%
- 1Y
- 2.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEMF.DE
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- -1.42%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBU0.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CBU0.DE iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.89% | 2.44% |
CEMF.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc | -1.42% | 2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBU0.DE and CEMF.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBU0.DE vs. CEMF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBU0.DE
CEMF.DE
CBU0.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBU0.DE | CEMF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.62 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBU0.DE | CEMF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.29 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
CBU0.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBU0.DE drawdown since its inception was -6.02%, which is greater than CEMF.DE's maximum drawdown of -4.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBU0.DE and CEMF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBU0.DE | CEMF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -4.45% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -2.97% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -1.20% | -0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | — | — |
Volatility
CBU0.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBU0.DE | CEMF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.11% | 4.62% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 4.62% | +1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 4.62% | +1.19% |
CBU0.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBU0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CEMF.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CBU0.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBU0.DE nor CEMF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBU0.DE and CEMF.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEMF.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEMF.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CBU0.DE.
CBU0.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while CEMF.DE is Government Bonds. CBU0.DE tracks iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged), while CEMF.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year (EUR Hedged) Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CBU0.DE and 0.10% for CEMF.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBU0.DE and CEMF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer