PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBTO vs. NVDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBTO vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBTO) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBTO achieves a -8.23% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.


CBTO

1D
-0.16%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
-8.23%
6M
-11.17%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDO

1D
-2.46%
1M
14.15%
YTD
18.85%
6M
29.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBTO vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBTO and NVDO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBTO vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBTO) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CBTO vs. NVDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBTONVDODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-2.36

1.30

-3.66

Drawdowns

CBTO vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBTO drawdown since its inception was -21.08%, which is greater than NVDO's maximum drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBTO and NVDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBTONVDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.08%

-16.25%

-4.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.08%

-2.68%

-18.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.93%

-4.99%

-9.94%

Volatility

CBTO vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBTONVDODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

31.93%

-19.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.88%

31.93%

-19.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.88%

31.93%

-19.05%

CBTO vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBTO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBTO vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

CBTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than NVDO's 14.02% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBTO and NVDO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBTO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBTO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for NVDO.

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 0.24% for CBTO.

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBTO and 0.77% for NVDO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBTO and NVDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer