CBTO vs. IBIT
CBTO (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBTO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. CBTO is actively managed, while IBIT is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CBTO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
CBTO vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBTO achieves a -8.37% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -29.06% return.
CBTO
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- 6M
- -9.42%
- YTD
- -8.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- 6M
- -32.10%
- YTD
- -29.06%
- 1Y
- -47.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBTO vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CBTO Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -8.37% | -13.82% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -29.06% | -30.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBTO and IBIT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBTO vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
CBTO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBIT
CBTO vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBTO) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBTO | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.82 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBTO vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBTO drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBTO and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBTO | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -53.30% | +32.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.19% | -50.60% | +29.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.70% | -17.56% | +1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 32.72% | — |
Volatility
CBTO vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBTO | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.96% | 44.38% | -32.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.96% | 49.97% | -38.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.96% | 49.97% | -38.01% |
CBTO vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBTO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBTO vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
CBTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBTO Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.24% | 0.22% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBTO and IBIT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBTO.
CBTO has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
CBTO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBTO and 0.25% for IBIT.
Find the right allocation for CBTO and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer