PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBTA vs. CANQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBTA vs. CANQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBTA) and Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBTA achieves a -23.76% return, which is significantly lower than CANQ's 7.60% return.


CBTA

1D
-1.31%
1M
-9.26%
YTD
-23.76%
6M
-26.89%
1Y
-28.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CANQ

1D
-0.37%
1M
5.62%
YTD
7.60%
6M
5.52%
1Y
17.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBTA vs. CANQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBTA and CANQ is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBTA vs. CANQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBTA
CBTA Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CBTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBTA Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CBTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBTA Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

CANQ
CANQ Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CANQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CANQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CANQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CANQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
CANQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBTA vs. CANQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBTA) and Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBTACANQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.30

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

1.67

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

5.17

-6.59

CBTA vs. CANQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBTA Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the CANQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBTA and CANQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBTACANQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

1.67

-2.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.47

1.35

-1.82

Drawdowns

CBTA vs. CANQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBTA drawdown since its inception was -36.74%, which is greater than CANQ's maximum drawdown of -12.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBTA and CANQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBTACANQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.74%

-12.79%

-23.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.74%

-10.77%

-25.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.33%

-0.37%

-35.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.99%

-2.95%

-10.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.01%

3.47%

+16.54%

Volatility

CBTA vs. CANQ - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBTA) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) at 3.86%. This indicates that CBTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CANQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBTACANQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

3.86%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.83%

7.52%

+17.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.99%

10.76%

+18.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.68%

12.69%

+14.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.68%

12.69%

+14.99%

CBTA vs. CANQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBTA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CANQ's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBTA vs. CANQ - Dividend Comparison

CBTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than CANQ's 4.36% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBTA and CANQ have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBTA has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to CANQ (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBTA dropped -36.74% vs CANQ's -12.79%.

On 1-year performance, CANQ leads with 17.89% vs -28.38% for CBTA. On fees, CBTA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CANQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CANQ has performed better with a 17.89% return vs -28.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CBTA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CANQ.

CANQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 1.17% for CBTA.

CBTA is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CANQ is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBTA and 0.90% for CANQ.

CANQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBTA and CANQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer