CBSH vs. FUL
CBSH (Commerce Bancshares, Inc.) and FUL (H.B. Fuller Company) are both stocks. CBSH operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while FUL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, CBSH returned 8.99%/yr vs 3.34%/yr for FUL. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CBSH vs. FUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBSH achieves a 12.71% return, which is significantly higher than FUL's -5.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CBSH has outperformed FUL with an annualized return of 8.99%, while FUL has yielded a comparatively lower 3.34% annualized return.
CBSH
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 5.97%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- YTD
- 12.71%
- 1Y
- -4.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 1.99%
- 10Y*
- 8.99%
FUL
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -12.09%
- 6M
- -13.96%
- YTD
- -5.25%
- 1Y
- -10.17%
- 3Y*
- -5.92%
- 5Y*
- -1.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.34%
CBSH vs. FUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBSH Commerce Bancshares, Inc. | 12.71% | -10.16% | 24.71% | -15.91% | 5.56% | 11.44% | 3.71% | 28.74% | 7.52% | 3.07% |
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | -5.25% | -10.46% | -16.19% | 14.97% | -10.59% | 57.84% | 2.15% | 22.42% | -19.84% | 12.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBSH and FUL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.39 |
The correlation between CBSH and FUL shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.54 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CBSH:
$8.51B
FUL:
$3.01B
CBSH:
$4.16
FUL:
$3.36
CBSH:
14.04
FUL:
16.65
CBSH:
3.86
FUL:
0.88
CBSH:
1.98
FUL:
1.48
CBSH:
$2.10B
FUL:
$3.51B
CBSH:
$1.31B
FUL:
$1.14B
CBSH:
$614.94M
FUL:
$511.88M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBSH vs. FUL — Risk / Return Rank
CBSH
FUL
CBSH vs. FUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBSH | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.97 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | -0.42 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.37 | -1.26 | +0.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBSH vs. FUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBSH drawdown since its inception was -44.70%, smaller than the maximum FUL drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBSH and FUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBSH | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.70% | -68.25% | +23.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.44% | -26.97% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.63% | -43.45% | +15.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.02% | -43.45% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.23% | -56.29% | +18.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.58% | -33.40% | +22.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.24% | -18.78% | +9.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.69% | 9.16% | +5.53% |
Volatility
CBSH vs. FUL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH) is 5.25%, while H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) has a volatility of 11.36%. This indicates that CBSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBSH | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 11.36% | -6.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.09% | 28.21% | -14.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.15% | 33.74% | -12.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.12% | 29.70% | -5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.38% | 31.17% | -4.79% |
Dividends
CBSH vs. FUL - Dividend Comparison
CBSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than FUL's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBSH Commerce Bancshares, Inc. | 1.86% | 2.03% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 1.50% | 1.47% | 2.00% | 1.48% | 1.61% | 1.55% | 2.93% | 2.04% |
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.70% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.40% |
Financials
CBSH vs. FUL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Commerce Bancshares, Inc. and H.B. Fuller Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CBSH vs. FUL - Profitability Comparison
CBSH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Commerce Bancshares, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 475.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FUL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a gross profit of 322.24M and revenue of 950.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.
CBSH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Commerce Bancshares, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 475.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
FUL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported an operating income of 122.83M and revenue of 950.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.
CBSH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Commerce Bancshares, Inc. reported a net income of 141.62M and revenue of 475.69M, resulting in a net margin of 29.8%.
FUL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a net income of 67.81M and revenue of 950.27M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBSH and FUL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUL has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to CBSH (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBSH dropped -44.70% vs FUL's -68.25%.
CBSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.26 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBSH and FUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer