CBSE vs. XSMO
CBSE (Clough Select Equity ETF) and XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBSE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Clough, while XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index. CBSE is actively managed, while XSMO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CBSE returned 10.41%/yr vs 11.40%/yr for XSMO. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CBSE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for XSMO.
Performance
CBSE vs. XSMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBSE achieves a 17.44% return, which is significantly lower than XSMO's 20.85% return.
CBSE
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- YTD
- 17.44%
- 1Y
- 22.91%
- 3Y*
- 24.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.07%
XSMO
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -4.08%
- 6M
- 14.13%
- YTD
- 20.85%
- 1Y
- 30.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- 13.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $202.38K | $195.77K | $371.19K | |
| $20.63M | $21.90M | $21.28M |
CBSE vs. XSMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBSE Clough Select Equity ETF | 17.44% | 19.53% | 32.20% | 17.29% | -19.92% | 14.57% | 17.27% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 20.85% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 19.24% | 11.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBSE and XSMO is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between CBSE and XSMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBSE vs. XSMO — Risk / Return Rank
CBSE
XSMO
CBSE vs. XSMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBSE | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.25 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 3.02 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.04 | 9.15 | -5.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBSE vs. XSMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBSE drawdown since its inception was -36.30%, smaller than the maximum XSMO drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBSE and XSMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBSE | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.30% | -58.06% | +21.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -9.44% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.40% | -24.76% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.30% | -29.62% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.97% | -7.34% | -4.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.13% | -11.07% | -1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.24% | 3.11% | +2.13% |
Volatility
CBSE vs. XSMO - Volatility Comparison
Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) have volatilities of 5.71% and 5.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBSE | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 5.63% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.76% | 15.61% | +5.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.56% | 19.92% | +5.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.56% | 22.58% | +1.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.07% | 24.13% | -0.06% |
CBSE vs. XSMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBSE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XSMO's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBSE vs. XSMO - Dividend Comparison
CBSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than XSMO's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBSE Clough Select Equity ETF | 0.29% | 0.35% | 0.37% | 1.50% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.55% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBSE and XSMO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBSE has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to XSMO (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBSE dropped -36.30% vs XSMO's -58.06%.
On 5-year performance, XSMO leads with 11.40% vs 10.41% for CBSE. On fees, XSMO is cheaper at 0.36% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 11.40% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSMO is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CBSE.
XSMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.29% for CBSE.
CBSE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while XSMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Clough and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CBSE and 0.36% for XSMO.
XSMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBSE and XSMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer