PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBSE vs. HTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBSE vs. HTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBSE achieves a 32.18% return, which is significantly higher than HTEC's -2.96% return.


CBSE

1D
-0.93%
1M
10.89%
YTD
32.18%
6M
29.85%
1Y
51.66%
3Y*
31.65%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*

HTEC

1D
0.67%
1M
3.12%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-3.90%
1Y
26.68%
3Y*
5.17%
5Y*
-4.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBSE vs. HTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CBSE
Clough Select Equity ETF
32.18%19.53%32.20%17.29%-19.92%14.57%16.87%
HTEC
ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF
-2.96%23.91%2.68%-2.94%-33.72%-0.28%13.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CBSE and HTEC is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2020

0.70

The correlation between CBSE and HTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBSE vs. HTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBSE
CBSE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CBSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBSE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CBSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

HTEC
HTEC Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBSE vs. HTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBSEHTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.23

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

1.64

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.59

4.07

+7.52

CBSE vs. HTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the HTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBSE and HTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBSEHTECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.32

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

-0.20

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.21

+0.60

Drawdowns

CBSE vs. HTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBSE drawdown since its inception was -36.30%, smaller than the maximum HTEC drawdown of -57.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBSE and HTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBSEHTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.30%

-57.53%

+21.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.57%

-16.31%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.40%

-28.67%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

-56.10%

+19.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-33.25%

+32.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.31%

-28.99%

+16.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

6.57%

-2.10%

Volatility

CBSE vs. HTEC - Volatility Comparison

Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) at 5.82%. This indicates that CBSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBSEHTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.80%

5.82%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.58%

14.90%

+2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.55%

20.32%

+2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.06%

24.39%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.79%

25.46%

-1.67%

CBSE vs. HTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBSE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HTEC's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBSE vs. HTEC - Dividend Comparison

CBSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than HTEC's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CBSE
Clough Select Equity ETF
0.26%0.35%0.37%1.50%0.52%0.00%
HTEC
ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF
1.01%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBSE and HTEC have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBSE has higher volatility (7.80%) compared to HTEC (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBSE dropped -36.30% vs HTEC's -57.53%.

On 5-year performance, CBSE leads with 12.52% vs -4.88% for HTEC. On fees, HTEC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HTEC has been the lower-risk option at 5.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CBSE has performed better with a 12.52% return vs -4.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HTEC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CBSE.

HTEC has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.26% for CBSE.

CBSE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HTEC is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: Clough and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CBSE and 0.68% for HTEC.

CBSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBSE and HTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer